187
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Japan's fisheries agency said on Saturday fish tested in waters around the wrecked Fukushima nuclear plant did not contain detectable levels of the radioactive isotope tritium, Kyodo news service reported.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rivermonster@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In America when the FBI investigates itself it find no wrongful shootings, same with the police.

Enjoy the fish.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Good thing it's not just Japan saying this then. Everyone that knows what the hell they're talking about are.

[-] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

If it was Japan's word on it, I wouldn't trust it either. But the measurements are a solid science that's easy to do, and hasn't been disputed

[-] rivermonster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The inferences drawn and assumptions of what the data means is not as cut and dry. Researches are regularly and constantly frustrated by this aspect of reporting on their findings.

[-] rivermonster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

And yet there are no studies of the time it takes to have radiation propagate through this specific ecosystem and a comprehensive accounting of it's potential downstream impacts and vectors. Thus making an early propoganda piece that imparts a false sense of safety, dangerous and irresponsible reporting.

Additionally the assumption that the release of radioactive material will be a constant and consistent rate and not vary or get significantly worse is just that--an assumption.

If you think the science on fukishma and releasing radioactive water into the ocean there is done and settled and everything is fine... No radiation in fish... Then brother do I have a deal on a slightly used bridge that you cannot afford to miss!

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 17 points 1 year ago

Cynicism is a lazy cognitive shortcut that leads to wrong conclusions almost as often as naivete does.

[-] rivermonster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Denial of the realities of a capitalist world and it's horrors are how we got here in the first place. It's not just lazy to be blindly optimistic and ignore the track records of the nuclear industry and the failures of regulatory bodies in charge of them--it's literally deadly.

Head in the sand is a luxury best left to shit posters on the internet. When they're actually able to influence things we end up with Fukishimas.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not denying anything. You're the one ignoring everyone who actually knows what they're talking about.

[-] rivermonster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're holding up a bad inference piece on data of questionable value that is touted by the Japanese fishing industry saying Japanese fish is fine to eat. And there are even contradicting studies.

Did you read this piece? if you cant see why this is not people who know what there talking about and instead an entire industry, commerce and job sector and country that have a financial incentive to produce a specific answer...

I dunno how to help.

Someone on this thread was even nice enough to have leaked other info for ya...

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/24/fukushima-fish-with-180-times-legal-limit-of-radioactive-cesium-fuels-water-release-fears

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

That article does not support your claim. Cesium that was almost certainly released during the initial disaster has nothing to do with the IAEA-approved release of tritium now. You're just reinforcing my belief that you're pissed off about things you don't understand and you think you're smarter than the experts who study this shit for a living.

this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
187 points (100.0% liked)

News

23266 readers
3079 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS