760
submitted 1 year ago by BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Except for the inherently fraudulent charter schools, of course, but those don't count for a reason mentioned in the beginning of this overlong sentence.

[-] neeshie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Wait charter schools get money thrown at them? Mine had a lot less funding than public schools

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Yes, and politicians are trying desperately to change that. Several Republicans on the debate stage said they'd get rid of the department of education. The whole thing. Zero public schools, Though you bet your ass they still want subsidies to charter schools...

[-] alaphic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Only the ones their friend(s) own, though. Gotta steal from the poor to give to the rich somehow, after all. And - added bonus - no more worrying about children being taught pesky things like the blacks are people too, that being gay isn't an affront to God, or the downright silliness of anthropogenic climate change.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
760 points (100.0% liked)

196

16453 readers
1802 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS