297
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world

The admins on lemmynsfw.com have decided to allow "non-IRL loli", i.e. drawn porn involving children/teenagers. (Post: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29633).

Irrelevant of the moral issues that this poses, such content is illegal in many countries (e.g the UK). Continuing to federate with lemmynsfw.com will put users at risk of significant legal repercussions.

Please would the admins consider defederating unless lemmynsfw change their policy.

UPDATE: The lemmynsfw admins posted an clarification here: https://lemmynsfw.com/post/29826. My original argument for defederating doesn't stand any more.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sorenant@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think those countries should put the resources used to go after neckbeards fapping to drawings to investigate people trafficking real children.

[-] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

the venn diagram is a circle

also, that aside, "the resources" here are a little different, mounting investigative operations to bust lolicons/pedophiles (same thing) requires more resources than just flipping the switch off on some pedophile's ability to communicate freely

[-] sorenant@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Are you the kind of person that says people playing FPS games are more likely to become mass shooters?

It might not be our liking but loli is at worst a victimless crime, not the same as the real pedophiles (eg Epstein's associates, like Prince Andrew). I think by saying they're the same, you're actually belittling the gravity of the other.

[-] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a really good argument until you learn that mass shooters are less than one in a million but child sexual abusers are more than one in a hundred, despite there being tens of millions of FPS players and probably only hundreds of thousands of CSAM consumers in America. It's a catchy gotcha but it completely fails to hold up under material scrutiny.

Mass shootings and child sexual abuse are very different things, and so are CSAM and video games. You would benefit from losing some of the reductivism you've got there.

[-] sorenant@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

You're actually supporting my point. Despite tens of millions of FPS players, there's only less than one in a million cases of mass shooting. Meanwhile child abuse is more common despite loli stuff being uncommon in US compared to places like Japan. This to me seems like an argument to say there's no correlation between the fictional and real counterparts.

If anything, being unable to set apart reality from fiction and saying both are the same is the reductionist stance.

[-] Swiggles 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not the assault, violence or having a victim making them a pedophile. It's the attraction to minors. It doesn't matter if fictional or real, they are pedophiles.

Many of them probably even act in it, e.g. masturbation.

[-] sorenant@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's reprehensible but if they're not really acting on it, as in harming someone else (masturbation, really?), then why should it be a crime and the state be involved? What are you suggesting is that the mere thought of it, involving fictional people at that, should be a crime. Are we certain we want thoughtcrime?

That sort of vilification only makes them more likely to hide instead of seeking professional help. Why would they, if doing so would open them to ostracization?

[-] Swiggles 1 points 1 year ago

You are jumping to conclusions here. Also just thinking of extremes is not helpful. Acting on your desires to perform sexual acts with children is absolutely pedophilic behavior. So masturbating is just that. It is not just a thought, it is an action. Even though non pedophiles don't even have these thoughts without disgust.

Just ask yourself, would you ever be comfortable leaving a child alone with someone who sexualizes children? My answer would be absolutely not, they are pedophiles and a huge risk to the childs safety.

How to solve this or manage the risk is another way more complicated topic.

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
297 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

28987 readers
4 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS