615
safe space (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by user@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

No, the meme is accurate. The owners of beehaw are so obsessed with protecting their users from possible harassment that they are willing to put them in a prison with no communication with most of the outside world (lemmy.world has the most active users and sh.itjust.works is in top 5).

[-] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

And the users on beehaw are free to create accounts on other instances if they want. Your prison metaphor is a bad one.

[-] New_account@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I'll be honest: that's a shitty way of handling this. Making 20 accounts to view content from 20 different instances that don't want to cooperate with one another defeats the purpose of all of this. If that's the plan, the Lemmyverse or whatever it's called is dead on arrival.

[-] dragontamer@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

The plan is to refederate after Lemmy moderation tools catch up to the needs of Beehaw.org.

Seems reasonable to me?

[-] minimar@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

It's just temporary, primarily due to lemmy having very poor moderation tools. Once moderation tools improves, beehaw mods should be able to handle refederating.

[-] Fylkir@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago

Just use small instances with good moderation policies.

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

They are restricting their users freedom. But yes the users are free to leave.

[-] spicytuna62@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And they can leave beehaw on a full-time basis. Let the admins decide how they want to run their instances, and if users don't like it, they can hop over to another. This is all a part of how decentralization is supposed to work. Of course it's messy and inconsistent.

There are plenty of beehaw users who agreed with defederation. After all, they had to essentially write an essay to be allowed in at all. I'm not surprised there are users who are okay with defederating. And again, the ones who aren't are free to make accounts on instances with open door policies, like shit or world. Beehaw admins probably prefer it that way anyway.

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Did those users agree after the fact or were they asked first? If there was a vote and that's what their users choose then I take back what I said. My impression was that there wasn't any vote.

[-] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I have a BeeHaw account and a lemmy.world account. I'm not imprisoned lol, it's the Internet, not some.private island. Nothing's stopping anyone from browsing or joining any of these communities

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

People's freedoms were limited for no good reason. But you are right that they can leave. Users can leave Reddit too.

[-] buddhabound@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Freedoms were not limited. Any user can still go apply for a beehaw account if they want one. Any beehaw user can open an account on any other instance they want. People can still talk, people can still be heard.

No one is entitled to force others to listen to what they say. Beehaw's owner pays for their server. It's their own private instance. They can determine the rules that accounts that use or federate with their instance have to follow, and everyone has the freedom to associate with beehaw if they want.

Finally, beehaw isn't a government, taking an action to limit the freedoms of their citizens. In most modern, western societies, that is between governments and their people. In nearly every similar structure, those people do not have the same "rights" in regards to private businesses or private organizations.

Don't believe me? Go into a grocery store and start screaming obscenities at fellow customers and see how long it takes you to be forcibly removed and banned from the premises. And that won't be your freedoms being limited, either. It will be that private business deciding that you're not allowed to associate with them any longer.

This is no different. The people who run beehaw can choose how to run their space. It's their money they pay for the service with. We don't get to tell them how to spend it. Their users and donors have a say in it, and if their users and donors don't like how the operators respond to their expectations, then they won't have users and donors. That's for them to decide.

People act like they're entitled to an audience with beehaw users, and they simply aren't. It's that easy. You can't just go into your neighbor's house and demand they listen to what you have to say. They can, and will, boot your ass to the curb, or worse, as soon as they're tired of listening. I'm not sure why this is so hard for some people to understand.

[-] eta_aquarid@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

fucking exactly lmao

people from other instances seem to have felt entitled to Beehaw's communities and are acting like something was stolen from them when they'd never owned it to begin with

[-] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

They could also simply apply for an account on lemmy.world, if they wanted. I hear the bar is pretty low, and the users of beehaw were indirectly notified of this, too. And the inconvenience of having to create a second account is almost nonexistent.

[-] lich_hegemon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Users are people capable of making their own choices. It they don't like the moderation approach they can just make a new account elsewhere. You don't get to tell them what they like.

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, how dare I criticize someone's actions and the impact they have on our community.

[-] eta_aquarid@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

I see, you see Lemmy as being one big community, rather than separate communities that can interact with each other

so you see defederating as like locking away a part of the community, rather than a community deciding to lock up for a bit

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

The community didn't decide this as far as I know. It was the owners who did it and informed their community after the fact. If there was some kind of vote and I missed it, let me know.

[-] eta_aquarid@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

fucking lmao

as if they can'f make an account on another instance

y'all are just hurt because you think you're being rejected and insulted by this, when they made it clear that it wasn't personal or permanent

[-] Freesoftwareenjoyer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

as if they can’f make an account on another instance

So that makes it right to cut people off from the outside world without asking them first? Do you want things like this to keep happening? Or should we maybe try other solutions first? Somehow other instances didn't have to defederate, so maybe it's not necessary?

[-] eta_aquarid@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

nobody is cut off, holy shit

this is not as big of a deal as you're making it

people can make new accounts on freer instances in seconds

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
615 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

30501 readers
2 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages 🔥

https://status.lemmy.world/

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to info@lemmy.world e-mail.

Report contact

Donations 💗

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS