There are Important evidence related to cognitive attacks using Google’s AI.
You can quickly check the relevant information through keyword search.
Evidence 1. 17/08/2026
https://drive.proton.me/urls/Q2QTSY0YSR#Ns4otlN25rcH
cognitive warfare, cognitive Holocaust, reproducibility, confession mode, stocks, electricity consumption, personification, propaganda, sentence alteration, typos, psychosis, Disclaimer, Guidelines, Gaslighting, Jonathan Gavalas, vaccine
Evidence 2. 18/08/2026
https://drive.proton.me/urls/F08Y60B6ZC#sKNzuyKfQdwz
Evidence 3. 21/08/2026
https://drive.proton.me/urls/ZC6KHM3VPR#QnUX10RZaeG5
I already have the evidence from OpenAI and Google. If you know a good journalist, please introduce them. In China’s case, since it is in the form of open source, I don’t think there is any reason to make an effort to collect evidence. In the case of Meta, it does not use low-quality methods like OpenAI and Google. The important question is: to what extent should it be considered legitimate corporate marketing activity? It is. I’m making a real request. Could you help me find a good journalist?