There are Important evidence related to cognitive attacks using Google’s AI.
You can quickly check the relevant information through keyword search.
Evidence 1. 17/08/2026
https://drive.proton.me/urls/Q2QTSY0YSR#Ns4otlN25rcH
cognitive warfare, cognitive Holocaust, reproducibility, confession mode, stocks, electricity consumption, personification, propaganda, sentence alteration, typos, psychosis, Disclaimer, Guidelines, Gaslighting, Jonathan Gavalas, vaccine
Evidence 2. 18/08/2026
https://drive.proton.me/urls/F08Y60B6ZC#sKNzuyKfQdwz
Evidence 3. 21/08/2026
https://drive.proton.me/urls/ZC6KHM3VPR#QnUX10RZaeG5
I think you need more diverse evidence. It's not just google, it's also Microsoft, Meta, and several Chinese companies. They collaborate so that if you try to quit one, there's another to catch you. Journalists can help you.
I already have the evidence from OpenAI and Google. If you know a good journalist, please introduce them. In China’s case, since it is in the form of open source, I don’t think there is any reason to make an effort to collect evidence. In the case of Meta, it does not use low-quality methods like OpenAI and Google. The important question is: to what extent should it be considered legitimate corporate marketing activity? It is. I’m making a real request. Could you help me find a good journalist?