181

For a community that bills itself as

“General discussions about “science” itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:”

And is full of news articles explaining science, having a biologist explain the science of sex biology is not a right fight for a general science community.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Yeah that's not a good reason to remove posts. Really hope we get an explanation.

Yeah. Feels like the right move would be to lock the post and remove the offending comments, rather than remove the whole post. The post itself is perfectly in bounds for the community. I also hope there’s a good explanation, but I’m prepared to be let down.

[-] Souvenir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago

Meh. If you're unable to properly moderate the comment section, you end up giving the bigots a platform, and vulnerable people are unsafe. That's how hate speech proliferates on the internet.

There's a good reason to lock certain topics, removing them less so, although it does stop bigots whining about not being able to share their stunning insights on those certain topics.

It's the whole reason places like beehaw or gay clubs exist.

[-] homik@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago)

If bad comments are enough to remove a post, then bad actors can remove any post by spamming it with bad comments.

[-] Souvenir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

Yep. Which is why I said above the mod was overreacting and should simply have locked down comments if it was getting bad and/or they felt unable to deal with the comment section.

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In the right contexts it can be a good reason. In this case I can imagine reports on the comments were flying left and right, despite the article itself having no issues. That might have provoked a removal, habitually to avoid needing to go into the comments section with a surgical needle to remove the transphobia, bigotry, off-topic comments and flame-baiting.

The post seems to have been re-upped by someone else, no comments, so I think (and you don't have to agree with me for any of this) there's no issue with the article itself. I'll be charitable and put the removal modlog comment as reference to the contained comments getting way too political for the site, rather than the article.

this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2026
181 points (100.0% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1859 readers
126 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS