76
The Game (mind game)
(en.wikipedia.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
76 points (100.0% liked)
Wikipedia
5231 readers
435 users here now
A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.
Rules:
- Only links to Wikipedia permitted (an exception is made for news about Wikipedia, where outside news sources are permitted)
- Please stick to the format "Article Title (other descriptive text/editorialization)"
- Tick the NSFW box for submissions with inappropriate thumbnails
- On Casual Tuesdays, we allow submissions from wikis other than Wikipedia.
Recommended:
- Use the search box to see if someone has previously submitted an article. Some apps will also notify you if you are resubmitting an article previously shared on Lemmy.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Except it's not. There's no summing. There's no score at all.
I understand the concept of you only thinking about it once (causing a single loss) and devising methods to maximize the amount of losses you will incur in others, but the "game" doesn't have mechanics where that matters. It's similar to other non-score keeping games like the circle game, but that one has a cost for losing (getting slugged) and a "benefit" of winning (getting to play torture your friend).
I realize I'm deep into pedantry with this topic and am ruining fun by analyzing it so much, I just never saw the appeal or where the fun is with this one.
Why do you say there is no score? You'd sum up how often you thought of the game. But most people don't do that (since that's excessive for what's mostly a joke, and it would incur more losses every time you saw wherever you were tracking the score), so it's mostly honour system.
You could play a casual game of basketball or mini golf or whatever without actually keeping score, but that doesn't mean there's no score and no mechanic for it.