169
Cars are surveillance devices. Here's the proof.
(www.youtube.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
169 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
50421 readers
361 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Not on my car, but i've noticed the camera indicator randomly turning on with out even opening the camera app.
nor mine, but that's because it's old AF. lol
On your phone ? If so what is the brand ?
Iphone
Me too. I sleep with my phone on airplane mode typically and I have woken up and checked the time and seen the camera indicator on for no reason. It’s quite disconcerting.
I find this happening on iOS and it makes me put my phone down in a visually obstructive spot more since I'm not into my camera being active when I didn't ask it to be. Unfortunately, the more you learn and live, the more you realize the paranoid delusions people used to call "crazy schizo shit" are actually probably true... to varying degrees of course.
iOS sends, what, 11MB of telemetry a day on average? Surely that can include audio and video compressed with those overpowered CPUs it runs on.
That's one of my biggest peeves. Pre-surveilance economy, the crazies really were paranoid. There were not cameras in their walls! Then, the whole ass world went, "Hey! What if we make their paranoia into actual reality?" Now, here we are. Maybe not cameras in the walls, but in every other damn thing. Your vacuum? Check. Your car? Check. Kids toys? Check. Sunglasses? Check.
That's made it harder to tell the diff between ppl who are actually paranoid ("vaccines are implanting Bill Gates tracking chips in your veins bro!") and those who aren't, but hate commercial surveilence. Plus, those who hate it, sound almost like an oldschool paranoid, to anyone who doesn't pay attention to know how pervasive it is now.
It's a fucked timeline, I'll tell ya what.
Yeah and also with evidence of experiments done on people (Tuskeegee experiments) and then downright negligence and cover ups done for greed (opioid crisis), add that to poor treatment for Dr's convenience or due to their willful ignorance (lots of women's medicine, birth practices, no numbing for painful procedures) then even the vaccine crazies have valid skepticism.
I believe in vaccines completely, but it's hard to argue with an anti vaxxer that the pharmaceutical corporations have their best interests at heart. They don't.
Fully agree with the fucked timeline and honestly agreeing with ignorance is bliss. I just wanna take the blue pill and go back to sleep. I want to be happy and trust my government like a dummy.
No, they really don't. To be extremely clear, it is nearly unanimous from every expert that there is no valid reason not to get vaccinated, and lots of very good reasons to do it. That is the consensus of the entire field. Immunologists, virologists, public health officials, in every country. It is as contentious in the medical community as saying the earth is round, not flat among geologists. Which is to say you can probably find a flat earther geologist or two. But they are crackpots.
All this "I believe in it buuuuut does is make people falsely hesitant about something that is the scientific consensus.