553
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
553 points (100.0% liked)
Today I Learned
31063 readers
218 users here now
What did you learn today? Share it with us!
We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules (interactive)
Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.
** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**
Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.
If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.
Partnered Communities
You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.
Community Moderation
For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
... in the United States
This is the internet. Please consider the audience to be worldwide.
Unless your country has specific laws to the contrary or is too poor/civilized to have this sort of "lazy parent" food, presume that any of the factory-made shelf-stable food in your grocery aisle is as bad as the equivalent sold in the USA.
(And find out of your country's food laws are actually better than the USA, or just "feel" better because the same exact product can just list fewer ingredients )
The former. In about 75% of the world.
American unable to imagine a part of the world where things are better, typical
They're legally mandated to have a table for every type of nutrient ( fats, trans fats, carbohydrates - split into subcategories of carbohydrate and carbohydrate sugars, salts, etc) in every packet of things sold as a Edible Product in which it has 2 rows - in a serving, v daily recommendation. In all of EU, and also in the UK. Asia is if anything even more stringent about it then we are and culturally prefer things as unprocessed as possible.
We don't ban unhealthy foods as long as they're not literally toxic, but this makes it so everyone makes informed decisions, and over time it has effected sales for unhealthy food, they have worse sales than healthier options
Ww have all of that in America as well. I had a great deal of confusion on this subject until the specific definition of one of the words involved was given to me. The problem in discussion here isn't labelling, or even ingredients, the problem is what's DONE to the ingredients before they get in the food. While some degree of processing happens to most food (Chickens are deboned, corn is nixtamalized, tomatoes are stewed) the issue here is the extreme level of processing rhe ingredients go through. Corn and Cardboard are both high in carbohydrates and fiber, after all, cardboard is mostly plant matter rendered down and cooked/shaped, but one is food and the other has been processed so thoroughly that it's not.
Many companies are rendering their ingredients so thoroughly before reassembling them that they're resembling "food" less and less and not doing great things for us nutritionally even though they still measure at certain levels on the packaging. Maybe Jaffa Cakes retain more of the base nutrtion level of the flour in them than twinkies do, but it's the same base processes occurring to both of their ingredients, just at different levels.
Consumer protection laws are really alien to folks from the states it seems.
You really don't know what you're talking about.
I bet you'd also argue that there is "free speech" in the UK, where a billionaire can still literally sue someone into poverty for accurately describing them. Or the same in Germany, where an advocate against the Palestinian genocide was arrested for "denying Israel"
I'm not from either of those countries, are you a person that likes to put words in other people's mouths? 'Cause it sure as fuck sounds like you do.
I tend to speculate negatively when people hurl unfounded insults without disclosing the reason for their perspective.
I encouraged people to not assume that their local regulation's are "better than the USA" because the same greed that causes so much waste in the USA is also present in literally every human country. And you decided that this meant my country doesn't have consumer protection of any kind.
If it makes you feel better, tell me what country you are from and I'll take the time to look for an appropriate example of your country fucking up in a way that wouldn't happen in the USA.
Belgium, good luck. I don't need to know what country you're from. Your ignorance is telling (but it's also bliss, so lucky you).
You're right, it's hard to find distinct history for a middle European country that was a footnote for most of your small and young country's history.
But the internet provides.
Even if we exclude both your country's precursor states and the various wrongs attributsble to the European Union you were substantially responsible for, Belgium:
And, while I'm neither a lawyer nor sufficiently fluent in French or German to read your laws directly, it sure as fuck looks like you've got the same sort of repressive defamation laws that let JK Rowling bully Amnesry UK into apolgizjng for accuratky describing her.
http://legaldb.freemedia.at/legal-database/belgium/
Based on your country's recent "hard-right" swing, you might acthally see your own neo-autocrat soon, who would absolutely weaponize those laws if they haven't already started.
If truth and honesty are not both separately prefect defenses to accusations of defamation, you don't have free speech in the ways that actually matter.
So you did a quick shit-GTP search and now you know more about my country's history than I learnt in 6 years of history, about my country?
Wow. True American.
Is that supposed to be a rebuttal, or did your "6 years of history" not include how to structure an argument?
I told you it'd be simple to find something your country did worse than the USA, and I found five plausible examples, including one of the glaring eurozone issues I'd suggested before. I'm actually surprised that "slavery" and "LGBTQ rights" are plausibly on there.
I would hope that a learned historian such as yourself would know better than to assume that their country is uniqjely benevolent, but people who know that usually don't start mounting off about foreign countries and then start sputtering when someone points out their own country's failings.
Was your educational study an academic focus or just the primary education propaganda that every industrialized country in the world feeds their citizens?
I never said I was a historian. I just had 6 years of history like everyone gets in our educational system. You keep assuming, my man. We actually learn a lot about the black days in our country's (small) history. Our schools aren't tainted (yet). Don't know about the US of A though, but what I'm hearing through the grape vine is not making me very excited for your future academics.
Holy shit, the propaganda has really done a number on your perspective and I'm tired to pretend it didnt.
It's you, not the rest of the world, that is different.
Lmao. Ameribrain at work.