515
They walk among us (discuss.online)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] d.rizo@piefed.social 62 points 1 day ago

Maybe we should start reviewing churches the same way: Nice church but the guy at the front was talking funny about his imaginary friend... Only two stars.

[-] Seasm0ke@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

Lol the stained glass was beautiful but they hate gays here

[-] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

The priest clearly doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Matthew 6:5-6 states “And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. But when you pray, go into your room, close the door and pray to your Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.”. One star for not obeying the Bible.

[-] osanna@lemmy.vg 0 points 21 hours ago
[-] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

And the incest

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

This right here. If you're going to post a review of a church, review them based on how their actions conflict with what they claim to believe.

[-] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

More importantly, if your faith is having an effect on policy.. guess what, your religion must now start paying taxes.

Why should the rest of us pay for your idiotic ideas that are now turning into policy and law.

[-] baronvonj@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

That would gladly pay the taxes if it means they get to force their religion on people. They already openly.defy election law by endorsing candidates and "vote yes on prop 66” statements during services, inviting prosecution because they expect to win in court.

[-] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 hours ago

I mean, if people understand "no taxation without representation" well, then logically: "no representation without taxation" should be equally easy to get behind.

They are already in our politics, may as well get them to pay for that privilege.

[-] baronvonj@piefed.social 1 points 6 hours ago

Well .. I'd enforce the separation.

this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2026
515 points (100.0% liked)

Atheism

6344 readers
801 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS