690

Baby boomers comprised a larger share of voters in 2024, accounting for 32%, but they are trending lower after hitting a peak of 36% in 2016.

Ocasio-Cortez, a millennial herself, expects the younger generation will soon tip the scales in American politics.

“Millennials are not punk kids anymore. We’re grown adults with mortgages and kids,” she said. “And we—that generation is starting to be decisive at the polls. And there is anger at being ignored, sidelined, having our economic futures mortgaged by the generations that came before us on everything from the economy to climate. And we’re taking the reins.”

From global warming to debt crisis to lack of affordable health insurance (all intentional), Boomers have definitely overstayed their welcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

True, but you had to be in a position with money saved up and your career unaffected by the recession so unfortunately that's a relatively low percentage

[-] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

I mean prices were lower for like 8 years before exploding with low interest rates, time was there to save

[-] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Sure but the job market was a joke so if you weren't already established in a stable career, your income was going to be pretty garbage on top of school loans. Realistically, you would be looking at college grads who have enough seniority in their career that wouldn't put them at risk of being let go as well as having little to no school debt. You're looking at people who are at least 23, more likely late 20s in 2009ish. That's certainly near the '81 cutoff for millenials. I was 18 in 2008, luckily retained my low paying retail job while going through uni, with my school debt and the garbage job market, it wasn't feasible at all for me to take advantage of the prices.

[-] smh@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago

Wait, when did the cutoff for millennial become 1986? Last I saw it was 1981-1996, with some fuzziness at the edges.

[-] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago
[-] smh@slrpnk.net 0 points 13 hours ago

Thanks :) I was worried I'd have to start fitting the stereotypes of a different generation.

[-] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

I was also in uni in 2008 but graduated in 2010, bought my first place in 2011

[-] TheReanuKeeves@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I'm happy for people that were able to do that but you gotta understand you're probably in the like <10% that could do that. I doubt you would say you were in the same situation as most people born between '81-'96. Gen x was in the best position to take advantage.

[-] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago

My younger sister somehow bought a house with her friend. Her first job paid $80k a year. I made $7.25 and hour and this was not an option.

Just another, the privledged got to buy, and the poors didnt.

[-] Polisheocket@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 day ago

I was dead broke after I bought. Making $16 per house and my wife was making $20 an hour so not a lot by anymeans

[-] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

double income. You married so young?

$20 an hour for 2008 is A LOT.

threw it into the inflation calc. $20 an hour in 2008 is $31 today.

I was making $7.25 with a ten cent raise at the end of the year.

you were lucky, no shame, but both you and my sister were lucky.

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
690 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30743 readers
1781 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS