624
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Using what? Shotgun, paintball gun, pellet gun: I'll donate to this campaign/defense fund. Handgun, canon, or rifle: go fuck yourself.

[-] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Lol, what?

"I support it if he used a shotgun but by gawd if he used a handgun he can burn in hell"

This makes no god damn sense man.

Edit: I was wrong about this. The issue is that handguns and rifles will keep traveling and potentially kill someone. A shotgun with birdshot would not do that.

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Basic gun safety states to know your target and what lies beyond it. Even a simple .45 has the potential to go through a camera, wall, and into a person, meaning that a perfect shot still has a non-zero chance of your bullet taking out a person or ruining someone's day.

Using one of the first gun types displays foresight and consideration that I'd desire in a politician. The second type indicates a reckless figure who is uninformed about the tools and power that they wield, and doesn't embody the values of a politician I'd trust.

It's not enough to take action and be a badass; it's important to also show that you'll at least try to keep your constituents safe.

[-] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

That's fair actually and does make sense.

[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Well, shotguns generally are extremely range limited, and birdshot is pretty mild after a couple dozen feet. You’re not gonna hurt someone accidentally, even if you completely miss the thing.

Handguns and rifles have an extremely high likelihood of hitting something or someone behind whatever you’re shooting at and travel great distance. Miss the camera, and you end up doming some poor bastard just walking down the street a mile away, or hitting some kid chilling in their room.

[-] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

If by "extremely high likelihood" you mean "a remote but non zero chance" then I agree. It's obviously too high a chance to take when it could result in someone's death, but there's just to much empty space between people to make it likely he would hit someone.

[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Well if you’re aiming up toward a camera on a pole, and miss, there’s a 100% chance it hits something else behind it. That being a person is low, but that’s not the only irresponsible thing to hit with a bullet.

Also, there are 30-40 deaths every year from inadvertent falling bullets from shooting up into the air.

[-] EvilHankVenture@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm not defending shooting into the air, I'm just disputing the "extremely high likelihood" that you will hit a person.

[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I mean, if you just gloss over half of what I said sure.

You’re not disputing anything because that’s not what I said.

I said you have an extremely high likelihood of hitting “something or someone” behind it.

Which is absolutely true.

[-] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

That's fair acrually but I would hope he would walk up to it and shoot it and not try to hit it with a scope from 100 yards away.

There is truth in what you say though.

[-] Earthwormjim91@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

I've seen people completely miss a target from 5 feet out lol. And even then, the cameras are mostly plastic. A higher-powered rifle or handgun round would just go right through and keep going like nothing.

[-] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I broke my foot a few years ago and can't run anymore. I can't play anymore but I've really been considering pulling my paintball gun out of the closet.

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Let's cheer you up by going to the paintball range and purchasing far more paintballs than we'll be able to use in our allotted time. I'm sure you'll dispose of the extras safely.

[-] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Also, going to the beaches here in San Diego and harassing the people harassing the seals and sea lions.

[-] fartographer@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Of course, you're joking and we'd never do anything like that. In fact, we were busy studying the white Jesus Bible when we saw those people's backs spontaneously expel paint splats onto themselves.

[-] Legosgirl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Couldn't have said it better myself.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
624 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86934 readers
2087 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS