201

Snapchat’s automated system flagged a private DM to three contacts and triggered an FBI alert in under 60 minutes, ending her teaching career

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 48 points 2 weeks ago

she sent a private Snapchat message referencing shooting the child or the school

Yeah talking about committing a school shooting is going to get you flagged.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 74 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think the government should be reading private messages

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 2 weeks ago

It usually (probably) isn't. Snapchat (meta) is reading your private messages and then sending problematic ones to the government.

If you don't like that, then you should be using a messaging system that's actually private. Which means, at a bare minimum, end-to-end encryption.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago

Snapchat is not owned by Meta

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Not owned by meta yet

[-] noxypaws@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

tangent, but:

and yet Facebook still snooped on Snapchat via MITM attacks

https://techcrunch.com/2024/03/26/facebook-secret-project-snooped-snapchat-user-traffic/

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

They're not private. Never were. Snapchat was always a lie.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

True but in this case the automated system got it right

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago

Did they? Was this a genuine threat to student safety?

And even if they did get it right, how much privacy is worth giving up? How much would you like your speech chilled?

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If a student teacher sent something like that to me I would almost certainly turn them for the safety of all involved. "Jokes" about violence is often times a sign of poor mental health.

Just to be clear I don't support mass surveillance. However, I also can't condone violence or threats of violence especially against children.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 5 points 2 weeks ago

It almost certainly was not a sincere threat of violence. No one is asking you to condone threats of violence against children. You can narc on your friends all you like, but that's a separate discussion.

[-] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Pick up that can

[-] Mr_WorldlyWiseman 8 points 2 weeks ago

"should I shoot him?" is not a threat.

Also, who made you the judge jury and executioner of Snapchat messages that get you fired from your job?

That's the AI's job and I don't want to see you stealing jobs from hard working AIs.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

While I don't support mass surveillance, this seems to be a case where it was in the right

[-] snoons@piefed.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago

"I don't support fascism, but in this case it's a good thing."

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
201 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

10580 readers
218 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS