1654
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

They're both infringement, and no-one in authority cares about either. This is kind of the situation we collectively negotiated post-Napster. Piracy is allowed to exist as long as distribution isn't being directly commercialized; it is only addressed in a piece-meal fashion by big publishers on a short-term basis for their critical first weeks.

[-] racketlauncher831@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Ripping a DVD isn't copyright infringement. If the playback program caches the output video 500ms in advance, is it infringement? If my computer has any DRAM, is it infringement? If the law says it is, the law needs to change.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

"The law says Not P. If the law says P then the law is wrong." Thanks, councilor; we'll take your learned contribution under advisement.

[-] Ibuthyr@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

But the LLM companies do make money off the content it was trained on, no?

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

Yeah? I can make money off the information I pirate. Nobody asks, "Where did you learn that knot? Did you pay for Ashley's Book Of Knots? Because if not, you're in trouble!"

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 20 hours ago

This is just an example. I do have a pirated copy of ABoK but I also own an original print.

this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
1654 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7800 readers
974 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS