623
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 176 points 4 weeks ago

This is fucking stupid. If I delete something on my phone while I'm on vacation am I going to prison because the border patrol might have wanted to look at it?

[-] unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 123 points 4 weeks ago

Should have been born a child fucking billionaire if you don’t want to be sentenced to prison for 30 years.

[-] cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au 34 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

What color are you and how far left are your politics?

[-] kaotic@lemmy.world 27 points 4 weeks ago

It’s bullshit but with the current laws. Back up your phone before you head home wipe it before going through border control, and restore your backup when you get home.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 weeks ago

That's what I do but evidently that pisses them off

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

"It's SOP for my business. The risk of phones getting lost or stolen at or near airports is high."

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

This is great advice thank you

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

We don’t need hyperbole here …. If authorities have a legal reason to search and you interfere with that, destruction of evidence is a crime. Delete all you want …. Right up until authorities claim the legal reason to search. Usually that takes a warrant: investigators must convince a judge there is a good reason

This also includes “when entering the country”. It always has. There’s nothing new here. There are so many things the current administration does to violate rights and due process, but this isn’t one of them.

The slippery slope here is “or within 100 miles”, but that wasn’t a factor here either

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 16 points 4 weeks ago

This also includes “when entering the country”. It always has. There’s nothing new here. There are so many things the current administration does to violate rights and due process, but this isn’t one of them.

Have to disagree with that one. Simply entering a country is not justification for searching someones phone. I don't care what the law says. People have a right to privacy.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

I’m not saying I agree with it, just that it’s always been so

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 4 weeks ago

There are so many things the current administration does to violate rights and due process, but this isn’t one of them.

You literally said they are not violating rights by doing this.

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 2 points 4 weeks ago

He’s saying that right was taken away by George W Bush.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 4 points 4 weeks ago

Governments cannot take rights away. They can only infringe upon them. They are rights. Not privileges.

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 4 points 4 weeks ago

Then clearly you’re talking about deontological rights and they’re talking about legal rights and both wasting your breath

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 2 points 4 weeks ago

That should have been obvious by the fact that I said I don't care about the laws.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's how it should be. But that's not what the law says.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don’t care what the law says. People have a right to privacy.

[-] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago

as far as I understand, they were not there to serve a warrant. he was crossing a border and the feds are claiming that the 4th amendment doesn't apply because he hadn't yet crossed into America.

border patrol was essentially using a loophole to preemptively collect potential evidence (they'll figure out what to charge him with after they see his phone contents). he's a political activist against a cop city, they were obviously trying to do him dirty.

they were not serving a search warrant. they were abusing what should be an illegal search at the border in order to silence those who speak out against govt overreach.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 11 points 4 weeks ago

If he wasnt in the US how can the US claim he violated a US law?

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago

The US claims jurisdiction over its citizens wherever they are.

Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, because it means you can be prosecuted in the US for stuff like going to Thailand and sexually abusing children there.

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 weeks ago

So the law applies, but protection under the law does not.

Isn't all law essentially derived from powers granted by the constitution?

If the powers granted by it to enforce a law are applicable when not within the US then then it very reasonably ought to apply to any and all amendments.

But, reason is on the extinction list with the magafascists. (And all LEO)

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Are we reading the same article?

The incident took place at Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson airport in January 2025

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

So the important takeaway is to delete your phone before customs. Presumably you have an encrypted backup you can restore without too much effort

[-] lostoncalantha@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Finally a sensible reply. Quite a few NAZI bootlickers here. They’re the first the sign up it seems.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago

Good to know thanks

[-] isleepinahammock 2 points 4 weeks ago

That's not really how the law works. You're not making a comparable analogy. You sitting at home or in a hotel room is legally not remotely the same as when you're being actively searched by a federal agent.

This is more like if the a police officer is about to do a pat-down search of someone, and they reach into their pocket, grab something, and rapidly swallow it.

You can destroy your property in normal circumstances whenever you please. If you delete a file in the privacy of your own home, odds are you're not doing so for the purposes of evading law enforcement. However, if you do it literally seconds before law enforcement is about to get a hold of it, it's pretty unambiguous that you're trying to destroy evidence.

That's the crucial difference here legally. Plausible deniability does not exist when you're destroying something because a police search is imminent.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 13 points 4 weeks ago

Or maybe you just don't want some cop to see your dick pics. If they had anything on this dude they wouldn't have needed to go through his phone.

[-] isleepinahammock 1 points 4 weeks ago

I am explaining how the law works and the assumptions behind it. The law assumes that if you were embarrassed about your dick pics, that you would delete those before the officer is right about to search you.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 10 points 4 weeks ago

The laws assumptions are bullshit.

[-] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 weeks ago

This guy has no fucking idea how the law works. Destruction of evidence requires a primary crime, the one you're destroying the evidence for. There is no crime, therefore no destruction of evidence. Only an incompetent or corrupt judge would let this even go to trial.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Only an incompetent or corrupt judge would let this even go to trial.

Like just about every judge appointed by Trump.

[-] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yep. Backup and wipe before you get to the airport.

[-] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Nah, they just lube up the rubber gloves and fist you, checking in case there's a micro SD stashed up there. You should still make your flight if you relax.

[-] GMac@feddit.org 6 points 4 weeks ago

And thats why you dont travel to countries with ropey regimes

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2026
623 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

87473 readers
3041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS