801
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 30 points 2 days ago

Whatever. Metric is better in pretty much every other way, but Fahrenheit is demonstrably better for describing temperature as experienced by a human.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yes. Just as feet and inches are for height. And miles are for distance. And pints and quarts for liquids. And ounces and fluid ounces.

We can make as many of these exceptions as we want, and the only clear winner of the "most ubiquitous use of imperial" has to be inches on porn sites.

But what objectively is the truth is: the rest of the world, save for Liberia and the other place use metric for everything, with the UK being another strange holdout, use metric. International communication is less and less America-centric, and Fahrenheit is American hieroglyphs for us Europeans, because metric is very nice a system as well:

10°C is cold and 20°C warm. 0°C is very cold, 30°C very hot. 20+ is T-shirt territory, <10 is for a winter jacket. Two sentences to catch 80% of the nuance, tops.

To become an expert in Celsius you only need to know 0-40. For Fahrenheit? 0-200 from what I gather. Celsius is very coarse, so every degree means something 15 is noticeably less cold than 14. Everyone has their t-shirt temperature. Mine's 17-18, someone else's 14-15.

Also, when dealing with the weather, you never use decimals. Not needed. A gimmick. As with most other things. The only time you use them is when you look for a fever. 35-37 is normal body temp, 37+ a fever, when measured under the armpit (which seems most common).

[-] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 1 points 14 hours ago

“Metric is better because it’s on a decimal system.”

Same People:

“0 to 40 is the best for temperature”

The former is true, the later is false, and anyone arguing both is a conditioned idiot.

[-] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago

Objective and simple. And having some baggage. That's what metric is.

And celsius is fully objective and simple, with none of the baggage the meter, kilogram or h:m:s have.

No one said metric was perfect, because it's not. It's the dumb dumb standard we have. But it works well enough for the vast majority of things.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 37 points 2 days ago

Fahrenheit is demonstrably better for describing temperature as experienced by a human.

I used to say this exact thing. I decided to be scientific about it and test it by learning Celsius and trying it for a few months.

I have not gone back. It has been seven years. All my devices are still reporting Celsius to me.

I was enjoying the process just because of the novelty of learning a new temperature scale, but when I experienced my first winter with Celsius I knew I’d never go back.

0 being freezing is so much more useful than you’d think. 23°F doesn’t really mean anything to me, but -5°C means “as far below freezing as 5°C is above freezing.” It inherently provides context without having to do math.

Also, the degrees being “larger” makes them more meaningful and thus easier to learn.

If you want to try what I did, here are some useful steps. First, this rhyme: “30 is hot, 20 is nice, 10 is chilly, 0 is ice.”

More importantly, here’s the heuristic I came up with: memorize the 10s. So 10°C = 50°F, 20°C = 68°F, 30°C = 86°F (easy to remember 68 and 86 because they’re reversed). Then memorize the 5s. You can always find them because they’re 9°F off from the 10s. 25°C = 77°F for example.

Once you have those points memorized, you can go up and down from them using 2°F per 1°C. It’s really 1.8, but since at most you’ll be 2°C away from a certain value, the most you’ll ever be off is 0.4°F. So if the weather app tells you it’s 22°C, you start at 68°F and add 4 to get to 72°F (it is actually 71.6 but who cares?). If it says 23°C, you start at 77°F and subtract 4 to get 73°F (actually 73.4, but again who cares?).

I used this heuristic until I didn’t really need it anymore. I still use it if someone asks me the temperature, because I live in the US and no one knows Celsius. So I quickly convert and give them their Fahrenheit value. But at this point I don’t really need to do so personally.

And like I said, I much prefer Celsius even for describing weather. It has really taught me how arbitrary both scales are. A co-worker of mine said, “Yeah but 100° sounds hot.” I replied, “The first time a colleague in India told me it was 40° outside, that sounded hot.” I didn’t need to convert it (didn’t bother memorizing that value because I never see it where I live), it just sounded hot because I knew the scale. (It’s 104°F for the record.)

But as I touched on, I was shocked by how much the freezing point being zero mattered. It makes sub-freezing temperature values so useful. I hadn’t expected that, growing up I knew 32°F was freezing and was so used to that nonsense that I didn’t realize what I was missing until I experienced it.

[-] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 14 points 1 day ago

I never used F, but as a discalculic person, i am glad i don't have because it's harder to memorize, while C is just "Uuh 0 is ice, 100 is boiling water" and i don't need to remember anything crazy or do any math

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Same, it's also nice because I really don't notice 1 degree F, but 1 C feels meaningful

[-] stingpie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Regarding what "sounds" hot, I think 100 makes more sense as the "super hot" number than 40. Although both numbers are arbitrary, 100 is less arbitrary. (Sorta. We just culturally define 100 to be an important number) Fahrenheit makes more sense if you think of it as "0 feels super cold, 100 feels super hot" although I'll admit it's a little strange that room temperature is 3/4s up the scale. That could be solves with a logarithmic scale, but that would probably be worse than either system.

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I understand where you’re coming from. It was my position before I tried my experiment! 🙂

At the end of the day, the best unit is the one you and the people around you understand!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] JusticeForPorygon 53 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I don't understand how this is the case. I feel like it would only be perceived as being true by growing up with the system. Like i guess I don't know where you grew up so I shouldn't really make this assertion but I feel like most people from countries that use Celsius have probably never thought "hey I think it's weird that 30 degrees is considered really hot."

I guess you could make the same argument that people living in the United States don't complain about water boiling at 212 degrees but that also doesn't address the compatibility issue

[-] kahjtheundedicated@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

It’s pretty much just 0 is really cold and 100 is really hot as far as weather goes. Besides that it feels pretty arbitrary. I’m a metric stan, but I do still think Fahrenheit is pretty good for talking about the weather.

[-] Saapas@piefed.zip 25 points 2 days ago

That's pretty damn subjective lol. At least the zero point (something important to people living in countries where it falls down to that) gives off useful info.

[-] LurkingLuddite@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago

All numbers are arbitrary until you relate them to reality. This whole debate is fucking stupid vibe checks on how people feel about meaningless numbers, because the temperature is the temperature whether it's -40 or 233, or 420.

[-] Saapas@piefed.zip 17 points 2 days ago

I mean the zero point of Celsius isn't a vibe in the same way as "pretty cold, pretty hot" or however people describe Fahrenheit. It actually means something to real life that it gets to zero or goes negative. 100C is for most people much less useful tbf.

But mainly it's about what you're used ofc. I just hate the nonsense thing about Fahrenheit being better that is about vibes alone

load more comments (17 replies)
[-] ElectricTrombone@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I won't argue which is better. But the human body thing has truth to it. He literally designed the scale around common temperatures. 100 was supposed to be human body temperature (he ended up being a little off, but close). And the 0 on the scale was found by just adding ice to salt until it stopped getting colder IIRC.

[-] Rothe@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago

He literally designed the scale around common temperatures.

Common temperatures in some places. And also just because it is scaled this way doesn't mean it is better. It serves the exact same purpose as any other way to measure temperature.

[-] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Also having a nice scale from 0 to 100 as "really fucking cold" and "really fucking hot" is arguably easier to understand.

[-] Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago

You'd have a point, if the weather stopped at 100°F.

[-] Nythos@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago

Only if you grew up with it.

0°c being the freezing temp of water makes a lot more sense to me than 32°F and so I can easily work around the scale of temperature using Celsius easier than I ever could Fahrenheit

[-] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Well... I didnt grow up with Fahrenheit and don't use it but it makes sense to me 🤷‍♂️

[-] Hegar@fedia.io 34 points 2 days ago

Fahrenheit is demonstrably better for describing temperature as experienced by a human.

It's just not though. F uses a wider range of numbers to describe common outside air temperature, but more numbers =/= better.

I've lived in both F and C countries and farenheit is not easier, more intuitive, more sensible or better in any way. A number is a number. The extra precision of F is not super useful - no one can really feel a 1F difference. The freezing point of water does make a huge difference, so knowing above/below zero C is useful, but above/below 32F is no harder.

This argument that F is somehow more suitable for human temperatures is something you see online, but as someone comfortable with both i can say there is functionally no difference, except that metric is compatible with the rest of the world.

[-] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

I strongly disagree on one key point:

no one can really feel a 1F difference

Yes I can. Changing my thermostat by a single degree can be very impactful on my comfort. And on the "too warm side" each additional degree is noticeably less comfortable.

Days with highs of 68F, 69F, and 70F and comparable humidity all feel different to me. Sure, there are more factors at play but holding the rest equal, 1F differences are noticeable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Rothe@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago

It is demonstrably not. You are more familiar with it, and you loathe decimals, so you are of the personal opinion that it is. But that is all it is, your personal opinion about it.

[-] D_C@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"demonstrably better"
Well go on then, I would like you to demonstrate to me how it is better.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

The argument is that since the numbers between 0 and 100 are sacred, as proponents of both metric and imperial temperature scales agree, that the system that centers that range more evenly over the range of temperatures experienced by humans is preferable, and wastes less numeric precision on common temperatures.

This is flawed because it turns out that 1) people can comfortably use a wide enough range of numbers that it doesn't matter and the value of the system you are used to far outweighs the saved handful of syllables and 2) people don't communicate about weather colloquially with enough precision or accuracy for any possible advantage to actually matter.

There are only two reasons to use one system over the other, and they're both consistency. Consistency with the rest of the world, and consistency with itself.
Everyone else uses metric, so we should too. It also uses a system, as opposed to a combination of every 14th century tradespersons system.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

With Celsius, you can't walk outside and exclaim in horror "It's a hundred and 20 fucking degrees!". "It's in the negatives." doesn't carry any weight either.

[-] inari@piefed.zip 24 points 2 days ago

It's just arbitrary numbers. It only seems better to you because you grew up with it.

[-] neobunch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

"demonstrably"? You don't have the self-reflection capacity to realize that you only think it's better because that's what is used wherever you happen to live? And to realize that it's the exact same for everybody on the planet?

[-] Instigate@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago

It’s interesting to me that the only people who advocate for Fahrenheit over Celsius in any circumstances are those who grew up using it, whereas those who prefer Celsius over Fahrenheit are from both places where Celsius and Fahrenheit are used. I’m yet to see an example of someone saying “I grew up with Celsius but Fahrenheit is so much better because…”

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 days ago

demonstrably

so do it

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago

Which units are best doesn't matter: the point is, nobody else uses standard units anymore, apart from a couple oddball countries, and only one of them - North Korea - isn't trying to extricate itself from it.

Everybody else tries to be a part of the world's technical and scientific communities by speaking the same language, but of course America has to be different. Because of course it does... And it's tiring if you ask me.

[-] xav@programming.dev 2 points 23 hours ago

You are calling that "standard units" ? When only 1 country uses them ? Oh the irony ...

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 1 points 14 hours ago

That's just the name of US customary units: they're usually called standard. Just like the old British customary units were called imperial when there hasn't been a British empire for quite a few decades.

[-] Zorque@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

America does speaks metric, especially the technical and scientific communities. They just also speak standard.

Don't other countries get on Americans for not speaking more than one language? Why is that now a detriment?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 5 points 1 day ago

I'm an American with a tenuous grasp of the C scale and even I know this is BS.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
801 points (100.0% liked)

memes

22050 readers
1798 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS