389
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
389 points (100.0% liked)
politics
30554 readers
1656 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Im sorry if I infered things from what you said. But, I am frustrated with the hoops people jump through to avoid discussing class conflict. You haven't once responded to the points I've made about class conflict and class consciousness. You just said "I'm overcomplicating it" rather than attempt to understand what was being said.
I'm not sure if you're purposely avoiding it. Or, more likely, you're just not understanding what is being said and you're filling it in with your own misunderstanding. But I'm not talking about "the rich" like they need to just pay more taxes and shits good. I'm talking about class not wealth. And more importantly, how that class structure gives only one class access to influence government (power).
I agree, online conversations like this are frustrating. But, you have now multiple times ignored my discussion of class and replaced it with things I didn't say. Instead you appealed to tribalism, calling people racist, or acting like I'm discussing a conspiracy. Nothing of which I've said.
If you want to push back on a perspective someone has, you should probably understand that perspective first. Because it's entirely based on class conflict. Something you've refused to respond to. I would have thought that was obvious from "capitalist Epstein class" that I mentioned in my literal first comment.
Fair enough. My comment was about people constantly calling everything "a distraction" from one specific crime. The article isn't really meaningful to the comment I made. So not really a part of any of the discussion.
I would say you don't understand what point I'm making because you are the very type of person lacking class consciousness that my initial comment was frustrated about.
I'm wasn't really trying to educate anyone with it. It was more venting a frustration.
I'm sorry if I was defensive in my responses. Its usually right wing reactionaries trying to point away from class conflict to something else. It would be better if you have a specific question about what I said. Rather than me trying to "explain connections". That's too vague to really answer.
Man, that's a lot of words to say "I don't actually want to learn what you're talking about".
It's not rude to point out what another person may not understand. That's not stupidity. That's lacking knowledge.
Stupidity is when someone is addressed with something they do not understand, take it as a personal attack, and then decide they would rather not waste their time to ask a single question.
You wouldn't look stupid if you asked me something simple like "what do you mean by class?" I'd be very happy to clarify my definition of the word and move forward from there.
But it seems you are too stubborn to do anything simple like that. You'd rather be upset by a condescending tone that I can't help but let out. If there is something I'm guilty of its definitely that.
Edit: Damn, when they delete all their comments.