480

The clash began after Spring refused to pay a $287 electrician's bill that his landlord forwarded him for the repair of a burnt-out socket in his unit. Shortly after, the landlord notified Spring that his rent would increase by $100 per month.

The jury awarded Spring $16,000 — an amount that Oregon law doubles to $32,000 because of the nature of the violation. On top of that, Spring's attorneys also are entitled to ask a judge to order the landlord to pay all of Spring's legal fees, an amount that currently stands at $225,000.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 141 points 4 weeks ago

200k in legal fees? What the fuck?

[-] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 124 points 4 weeks ago

Landlord probably tried to string it along to force the tenant to settle due to costs.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 63 points 4 weeks ago

This is the default strategy that I have seen. Civil courts heavily favor flexing resources wih stall tactics.

Very rarely does it pay off for the smaller entity even if they do win, but it's always nice to see when it does.

[-] chunes@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

I feel like there should be a circuit-breaker that stops the money flowing past a certain point. I don't care what accounting magic you use, a few hundred bucks should never balloon to 250k.

[-] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

If the landlord dragged the proceedings in order to push their tenant into being unable to sue anymore, it's perfectly reasonable for said landlord to be fully on the hook for everything. He's lucky he's not charged for the court's time as well.

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

And if the landlord hadn’t been such a shithead, it wouldn’t have.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2026
480 points (100.0% liked)

Anti Landlords

280 readers
1 users here now

Post anything rental / housing crisis related / just complain about your slumlord/landlord

Interesting:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS