1002
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

Putting aside the "why the hell would you want to do that?" aspect, let's assume that you're the guy in the picture and you do. It would be morally wrong even if the deer were alive because a non-human animal cannot give consent. It's wrong after it's dead because it's disrespectful to the deer, which was once a living being. Don't need religion to understand that.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It’s wrong after it’s dead because it’s disrespectful to the deer, which was once a living being.

But people eat the deer with zero moral qualms. Are you really going to tell me that yanking something's skin off, cracking its bones, gouging out its internal organs, and processing its meat into sausages for roasting is a sign of respect?

[-] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

If the animal represents your only available food source, consuming it is required to continue living.

You aren't going to die if you fail to rape a dead animal, but you might if you fail to eat one.

[-] r1veRRR@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago

For how many people do you think animals are the only viable food source? How many in this thread? Like 10%? Sure hope anyone with options therefore doesn't....

[-] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

is it true that anyone rich enough to eat deer meat need it, or any kind of meat at that, to survive?

[-] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I just thought it was really funny to read "rich enough to eat deer meat" because deer is pretty much the only thing that the broke rednecks in my neighborhood eat!

[-] __hetz@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I don't think you'll get consensus on the "it's disrespectful" reasoning. It might not be inherently religious (although most religions I'm aware of expand upon it to specific procedures or prohibitions) but "respecting" the vessel which once contained a life seems very much tied up in sentimentality and woowoo more than sound reasoning or pragmatism. It's just engrained into social norms at this point but, purely speculation, burial and burning were probably done for the same reasons other animals do it - you don't attract other predators or suffer the scent of death inviting maggots, flies and other vectors for disease. It probably became more ritualistic and religious over time. If I'm dead someone can dangle my lads from their rearview like a pair of fuzzy dice for all I care - which will be not at all because I'm dead.

[-] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

well, why is it we shouldn't disrespect? don’t get me wrong, i agree that we should respect, but many customs of respect like this one seem to have origins nearly as arbitrary as faith

[-] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

I mean there are evolutionary reasons most humans feel disgust towards things, in this case mainly the spread of disease. If none of these were problems, there isn't really a good moral case to be made against it unless you believe in some sort of afterlife.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
1002 points (100.0% liked)

Atheism

6242 readers
115 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS