950
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Psythik@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Seriously, has no one heard of sandboxing?

[-] python@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Yeah, when my company first forced Claude on everyone the head engineers managed to negotiate that Claude would only run in a WSL sandbox. But people were lazy, so they just gave that WSL as many permissions as possible (Mounting C directly to it, opening up all interfaces, popping in full-access git tokens etc.). Then management sent out an extremely biased "survey" that has the question "Is having Claude in the WSL inconvenient to you?" and all the lazy bastards said yes. So now management lifted the sandboxing requirement to make work "easier" for devs. In the meantime, the engineers arguing for proper sandboxing are already so worn out from telling people to not intentionally compromise their sandbox that they've kinda just given up. Not having a sandbox at all isn't much more insecure than whatever people are already doing 🫠

[-] psud@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago

I hope they have a good backup and recovery solution

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Of course they do. It's even mounted rw at the root of the AI drive for ease of access in case something goes wrong.

[-] MadameBisaster 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hope they dont so that it hurts and they maybe learn

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 1 month ago

I hope the engineers have a paper trail of emails advising against that.

[-] mcheva@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

I don't really see how fist fighting Arabs helps.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
950 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

32824 readers
786 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS