18

Text from the image :

The best logical fallacy to give an atheist when discussing morals is to ask them why it's morally wrong to have intercourse with roadkill

It's dead it will not feel anything, nobody will know and there are no victims

If you ask a Christian or Buddhist why it's morally wrong, they will tell you it's because the body retains inherent dignity as part of God's creation (or the sacred flow of life), and desecrating it violates divine/natural order, harms your soul/karma, and shows disrespect, even if no one feels it or knows

An atheistic worldview of this question taken to its extreme, concludes that intercourse with roadkill is tantamount to masturbation and nothing more

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What the fuck.

The concept of dignity is really not dependent on religious foundations. In fact isn't the modern concept of human dignity mostly a result of enlightenment philosophy. You know, from the guys who left religious though behind? And that later developed into the concept of animal dignity?

Also it isn't - as a rule - a common atheistic concept that humans are "above" animals, that's one is a Christian original.

this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
18 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

10181 readers
1094 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS