194
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

The discussion is about law surrounding AI, not LLMs specifically. No we don't have an AGI today (that we know of), but assuming we will, we will probably still have the laws we write today. So regardless of when it happens, we should be discussing and writing laws today under the assumption it will eventually happen.

[-] knotthatone@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

This thread is about ChatGPT, an LLM. It is not a general purpose AI.

[-] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

I'm saying the discussion about AI law. You can't responsibly have a discussion about law around LLMs without considering how it would affect future, sufficiently advanced AI.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
194 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37800 readers
307 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS