9
Nervous about making posts on my project
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
9 points (100.0% liked)
Open Source
47716 readers
119 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
Fully agree with the last bit. And let's be honest when we admit that there are "good use cases for AI and LLMs". None of us here are doing protein folding or crunching other ginormous datasets for science.
Using Claude to write code you don't have the chops to quality check... doesn't really qualify. That's just choosing convenience over safety. "Move fast and break things" as a service.
What if I do have the chops to quality check and actually do treat Claude like a junior coder?
I often use it for annoying tasks like "transform this data structure into the one which is specified in the new major version of the upstream API" and write a test before.
It basically saves me typing things and I would need to test my own code anyway. That's one of the good use cases: glorified autocomplete 😅
When you have an actual junior coder, they learn over time, including from their mistakes, until they're a senior coder that can do the same for others. When you're "treating Claude like a junior coder", you're just cleaning up after a mostly unchanging system. See also this article by a Zig contributor.
And having AI do annoying tasks (which you then need to double-check if correct anyway) you're missing out on the opportunity to get better at problem solving by skipping the part where you find a programmatic solution, even if it's a one-time thing. (Though when you work on an open source project, it's nice if others can verify how you got to your solution in the first place.)
Says every Dunning-Kruger sufferer who don't and can't 😉 I don't need to doubt your skills and dilligence, just those of every lazy hack who whack out slop projects without a second thought.
Sorry, but I think those outnumber capable, security-minded developers by a large factor.