520
Compromise (discuss.online)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Always enough leftitst to blame election losses on, never enough to force negotiation. We see how it is. Demanding our vote? Compromise with us.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago

"Our enemy is both very strong and very weak." Type stuff

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 14 hours ago

It's not up to them whether we can force negotiations lol. That's what it means to force them.

And yeah blaming losses on leftists is stupid because there truly aren't that many of us. I haven't found good polling but from what I can deduce it's in the single digits percentage-wise.

[-] zikzak025@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Someone will always highlight recent elections with incredibly thin margins, though. E.g. people who attribute Trump winning in 2016 to disappointed Bernie voters that didn't show up to vote for Hillary.

But that also ignores just how broken the US electoral system is anyways, where it doesn't matter how many more votes you have if they still aren't distributed correctly.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 12 hours ago

Yeah there are multiple reasons this breaks down but fundamentally it is the responsibility of leaders to convince voters to vote for them. If they fail to do so that's on them, not the voters.

Also, in tight elections there are always a large number of possible constituencies that could swing the election. It does not follow that they're individually responsible for the outcome.

Especially, since, y'know, as a leftist who typically does vote for democrats it's not as if I personally control what other leftists do.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

A blood clot the size of a pinhead can cause a heart attack.

Something can be tiny and still mess things up.

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 12 hours ago

Then it sounds like blood clots are worth taking seriously instead of just hoping they'll end up okay.

[-] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 1 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, but if someone is staring at a machine gun, the clots kind of get ignored.

And if the clots kill the person first, that really doesn't stop the gun man, does it?

this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
520 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

12057 readers
2403 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS