278
submitted 22 hours ago by thingsiplay@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml

Tim Sweeney claims it’s a “Scarlet Letter” which makes players “try to kill the game”

Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has criticised rival Valve for forcing studios to disclose when they use AI in game development.

Epic recently showed how it was integrating AI into Unreal Engine 6.

Time Sweeney said:

“If you want to launch a game, and get it as widely publicized as possible, you’ve got to put it on Steam so people can wish list it, and if you want to play it on Steam, then you have to get this Scarlet Letter of AI attached to your product, and now there is a hater community trying to kill the game.

“I think it’s really irresponsible of Valve. They shouldn’t do it, because it makes it much, much, much harder for a game developer to have a chance of success. You have to choose from either not using tools that can make you way more productive, and probably failing due to competition that does.”

Which is totally ignoring the factor that the user should know about the purchase it makes and be able to decide for themselves. Transparency for the player is not a bad thing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Epp@lemmus.org 5 points 3 hours ago

I don't like Tim Sweeney, or Epic Games, but I agree with him in this. In the future everything will use AI to some extent, and labeling it as such is stupid. It's like having a label for whether electricity was used, or whether computers were used. It will be meaningless in short order, and just slows down the entire industry by painting targets on games that are using modern development processes.

Besides, if the AI is THAT onerous, then you silent need a tag to identify it. It should be obvious, right? Make decisions based on the quality of a game, not based on what tools were used to create the game.

In the future, exactly. Not quite today.

[-] auzy1@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

How does it slow it down?

AI for Art is basically a way for large companies to profit from other people's work, and not pay for it (but mixing it up a bit). They could simply pay the artists for the assets, and it would be done faster..

Maybe the people whose work may have been stolen by AI wouldn't be appreciative to pay for games that potentially use it instead of paying artists..

Also, its not a ban on AI work. It's simply disclosure. Epic games is just trying to pick a fight about literally everything

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2026
278 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

27969 readers
425 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS