182
submitted 6 days ago by bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ILikeToMeow@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

This post is an excellent example of why reading Marxist Leninist Theory should not be treated as optional, there is so much wrong with the post I'm not even sure where to start, and I don't really have the energy for it either, so unfortunately we'll just have to leave it at that. (BTW Cowbee has an excellent guide to help you get started Basic and Advanced)

[-] huey_m@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

I'm very well aware of it and have studied it in an academic setting. It isn't all correct. It has insightful points that should be incorporated into a more well-rounded worldview rather than slavishly adhered to. But I came here to avoid reddit passive aggressive toxicity, so we'll just leave this conversation at that.

[-] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

You're saying we should Oppose Book Worship? That sounds like a pretty good idea, I'm down with that

[-] ILikeToMeow@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

This wasn't intended as an attack and I wasn't trying to be passive aggressive, I was trying to help. As someone struggling to over come life long crippling social anxiety, I've been trying to move from being a lurker to actually posting. But it turns out that participating in discussion takes enormously more energy than just lurking, so I did not put in adequate effort into my attempt to help.

I was overwhelmed trying to parse your comment, I'm still terrible at breaking things down into smaller, easier to process pieces, and so all the bundled up errors in your post was too much for me to try and break down and address, but I still wanted to at least try and help.

I was trying to read the rest of your posts in this thread, but I couldn't get through them all as the way you look down on people hurts my stomach. Please, we mean no hostility, so stop giving us yours. (thank you in advanced)

[-] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

I’m very well aware of it and have studied it in an academic setting

I don't wish to be dismissive I simply find it exceedingly hard to believe that in Amerika land of McCarthyism home of the red scare it is possible to achieve anything even close to a proper study of Marxism-Leninism in an academic setting.

[-] huey_m@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

Then you should probably reconsider if maybe your assumptions about my background were probably a bit too hasty and reconsider how you approach people going forward? I never said I studied it in America, and I do not live in America.

[-] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Not really the wild assumption you're attempting to make it out to be.

we have specific Constitutional rights

You're clearly Amerikan the vast majority of which have never left Amerika. My doubt in the proper study of Marxism-Leninism in academic settings also extends to every US client state (all of Europe including the UK, Japan etc.).

[-] huey_m@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago

I didn't say it's a wild assumption, just pointing out this is why it's probably a better idea to just... not make such an assumption in the first place. 4 million Americans live abroad, it isn't exactly unheard of. But with this clarification, it is now clear the point is just to personally find justification to dismiss dissenting opinion. Which I'm not particularly interested in engaging with, so I'm going to just put an end to it here. Have a good one, though.

[-] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

4 million Americans live abroad

1%. 99% odds is really good for such low stakes assumptions.

But with this clarification, it is now clear the point is just to personally find justification to dismiss dissenting opinion.

No I just don't like westerners diluting what it actually means to have received a true academic education in Marxism by parading around a nonsense credential from the core of anti-communism. And again I simply said I found it doubtful it was studied properly, as in with full context without some sort of at a bare minimum compatible left twist to at worst some capitalist bootlicking and NED tier nonsense added in "to give both sides" or such.

Which I’m not particularly interested in engaging with

Would hit harder if you had any engagement to speak of rather than stating vague generalities. You could have given some depth to what you studied and how etc show some bonafides yknow instead of dancing around the point so that you could run away feigning offense at someone making an assumption that is 99% precise.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
182 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

56065 readers
295 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS