377
submitted 3 days ago by streetfestival@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

but not efficacy

that's how you get snake oil

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

you make an adulterous and valid point. godsdamn curing ourselves by poisoning ourselves to death.

[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Actually, I was referring to how efficacy is not part of the evaluation criteria for chemo drugs.

https://nutritionfacts.org/video/how-effective-is-chemotherapy/

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Oh that's a better point. Thanks dude. Any opportunity to learn.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Plenty of that out there already, see the supplements category.

What removal of efficacy requirements does in reality is open the door to a lot more off label use.

this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
377 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

12089 readers
442 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS