16
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by CarlLandry357@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

I'm thinking of choosing Debian instead. I'm a student, low on budget, and wanna play with linux and laptops, and I think Arch or Cachy OS need updates or distro upgrades(?) weekly or something?

Solved: up to date Arch can last for 2 decades on my cheap laptop, and use Flatpak for older versions of software.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jorigicoku@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

You can if you know what you're doing, but you shouldn't. In the context of this question holding back an Arch package is not a feature of Arch OP should rely on in every day use. In Debian this is supported (up to a point).

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 1 points 16 hours ago

I would agree with that wisdom in general. I don't think any package manager would prefer a user piecemeal updates like that.

this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

65905 readers
631 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS