183
submitted 1 month ago by bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 weeks ago

Should we try to change this stupid two party bullshit? Absolutely...but not right now. Right now, there is too much at stake.

With such mentality, pro status quo, change won't ever happen.

[-] radiowaffle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago

Not directly going for the throat of the two party system =/= pro status quo. I'm saying we cannot skip over everything else before we can take that on. If you truly believe that we can just jump to that complete overthrowing of the government rather than first address immediate dangers on smaller scales and building up what's been destroyed, then I don't know what to tell you.

[-] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Étapisme failed hard everywhere. Why repeating the same mistakes?

[-] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The arsonist starts 20 fires. You put out one. They start 20 more.

"This is not the time to go after the arsonist, we need to put out all these small fires first."

This will never be anything more than a losing game of catch up. The fires will only grow and multiply until the arsonist is stopped.

[-] radiowaffle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

We can talk about these simplified analogies till we're blue in the face, but there is no substance behind it. How exactly do you propose we stop the arsonist then? If all we have to do is stop the arsonist, then how do we do it? Do we storm the capitol? Oh wait.......

There is no "just overthrow the government!!1!1" It's not that simple.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
183 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

56349 readers
428 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS