118
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
118 points (100.0% liked)
PC Master Race
21430 readers
651 users here now
A community for PC Master Race.
Rules:
- No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No NSFW content.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
They should have just built a gaming platform on Windows, the platform they owned. The one everyone was playing games on already.
Why would they do that? They make more profit selling a Windows license for your PC than they ever would selling consoles.
They’re never going to get a cut of the profits from 3rd party games on Windows the way they would with a console. The second they try to force every Windows game to pay is the second they all switch over to SteamOS.
See, the issue is that those developers are already paying Valve to be on Steam for Windows. Paying to be on Windows as well would be double taxation, and there’s no advantage to that after Valve gave everyone an outlet (Proton) to move everyone’s libraries to Linux and SteamOS.
So if Microsoft couldn’t charge anyone license fees to sell games for a Windows-based console, why spend all the money to develop one?
nah... screw them