1031
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by LeanFemurs@lemmy.world to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world

The Sotheby's auction house has been named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed by investors who regret buying Bored Ape Yacht Club NFTs that sold for highly inflated prices during the NFT craze in 2021.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 years ago

You're vastly overestimating the reasoning ability of prospective NFT buyers.

They couldn't accurately identify a picture. Instead of concluding "I can just copy and paste this", they overrode their common sense to convince themselves that a digital picture of a monkey was unique. Unerringly, truly, exceptionally unique. A digital monkey picture.

It's pretty great. NFT dimbulbs are the flat earthers of crypto.

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

NFTs remind me a lot of the international star registry.

You're paying someone a lot for them to record some unofficial bragging rights in some unofficial database that literally no normal person cares about.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 years ago

Wait...but the star is named after ME. It's mine, right?

[-] klyde@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago
[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

Omigod how do you know my name? Do you work for the star people?

[-] TitanLaGrange@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Very much like that, including how there can be multiple registries, like International Star Registry, Universal Star Database, The International Registry of Stars, Universal International Star Registry Database, etc., all 'officially' naming the same stars.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

I dunno. That’s kinda neat. Maybe in like 20,000 years humans will be exploring the Mongostein system.

[-] Eranziel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

You missed the part where literally nobody else will look to those registries to see what random people named them.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Doesn’t NASA do it? I dunno. I always thought it was kind of neat, but ultimately pointless.

[-] Pipoca@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Nope. The names are entirely unofficial. No one uses them.

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

Well I’ll be a monkey’s uncle.

[-] PM_ME_FAT_ENBIES 1 points 2 years ago

I've got a 50,000 dollar picture of your nephew

[-] dx1@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

The bet a lot of people made was basically, since we can have a market of these random things, and they are actually non-replicable at the actual ERC721 assignment level (I know you can copy and paste the actual pictures), that those ownership assignments just become part of the greater pool of "currency", with some having greater value than other.

They will probably retain some value indefinitely, in the same way Beanie Babies have managed to hold on to some value even today. It's of course just not even close to the peak bubble value, because a lot of people were behaving irrationally purchasing them with the whole fear-of-missing-out attitude, driving the price up further, vicious cycle.

[-] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It would be cool if each buyer has a unique hash and elements of the art are AI generated (like the background or texture) using some chaotic process with the hash as the seed, so that everyone gets a unique version. I would pay maybe a couple of bucks for something like that.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

That is a good idea, having a dynamically generated portion of the art dependent on a hash. That would actually be an NFT then, haha.

I still don't think I would pay a couple bucks for one, but I like your idea.

Shoot. Maybe I'd sell them for a couple bucks? Let's get on this.

[-] Reliant1087@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's the spirit 🤣 The challenge is building a team with both technical and artistic know-how to build something like this.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago

From what I've learned about online digital currency, we only need one exceptional department, and that is marketing.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

I wasn't into NFTs, but I did crypto for a bit when it was spiking just because I could. Don't underestimate greater fool theory. Plenty of people who bought either of these "assets" realize that they're only worth what you can sell them for and just flipped them during the initial bubble. The problem with that being that every asset that gets flipped results in some poor butthole holding the bag when the bubble pops. THAT is usually the true believer, the guy who honestly thought that he was just gonna keep this picture of a monkey in a hat and watch the value go up and up and up until he retired.

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

I appreciate those buttholes.

Solid quote.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
1031 points (100.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

4703 readers
623 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS