148
submitted 1 week ago by cm0002@lemy.lol to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

Who here has NEVER used the AUR with their Arch install raise your hand. I'll wait.

[-] Solemarc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't use any AUR packages, I don't even have an AUR helper installed ATM, If it's not in core/extra/multilib I use Flatpak. Generally I will go to Flatpak's for userland apps, Krita and Firefox are both in extra (I think?) I still use the Flatpak's for both. If I'm going to use the AUR I would generally prefer to just build from source.

That's pretty sound.

[-] moonpiedumplings@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Me!!

I stopped using it a while ago, and I get all my non arch packaged packages from nixpkgs. Nixpkgs is bigger than the AUR and the Arch repos combined. It has pretty much all of the stuff I would have otherwise gotten from the AUR. But I find Nixos frustrating to use, so I stick to Arch.

I felt extremely vindicated in my decision to avoid the AUR when the AUR malware happened.

this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
148 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

14097 readers
336 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS