248
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 23 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I read an interview, probably from NPR, but I can't find it at the moment. The upshot was that caring for infants is insanely expensive, since they need one-on-one care pretty much continuously.

But parents can't afford that cost, so, essentially, the price they charge for infant care is a loss-leader, and parents of older children (who need less supervision and thus more favorable staffing ratios) subsidize the cost of caring for infants. Daycare operators are barely keeping afloat.

Edit: Ah, here it is: Baby's first market failure

[-] Town@lemmy.zip 1 points 25 minutes ago

Are they required to provide for the more costly babies?

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
248 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

16476 readers
357 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS