609
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Robin@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Is it the drive train you have a problem with or the software? Because I think you just dislike new cars, not electric cars. In which case keep an eye out for the Slate EV

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago

If Slate makes a reliable vehicle from a new model from a new company, it will be an industry first.

[-] zewm@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It’s the waiting 45 minutes to charge that I hate.

[-] DarthFrodo@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

There are newer models that can charge to 80% in 15 min. It will probably take a while until fast chargers are widespread, but this is where things are going.

[-] zewm@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

That won’t stop battery degradation.

[-] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it won’t.

ICE engines also need oil changes, transmission fluid, headgaskets,belts.

I agree that modern “it’ll spy on you” car software sucks ass. The actual battery and charging tech is way way better than 2018 though. No one has to stop for 45 minutes.

[-] zewm@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yea and I can do my own maintenance. That’s another factor that sucks about EV. You can’t even do any work yourself.

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

No more oil to change so I can feel like a mechanic :( .

[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Oh look, a shell representative

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

don't you just charge overnight most of the time?

that's what most poeple do

[-] zewm@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yea, would be nice if I had my own house to add a charger to. I rent and have to use communal chargers.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Ok so you bought an electric car knowing full well you were not able to charge it at will at night (and I assume nowhere in your regular daily routine, like at work) and now complain about that?

I'm from Canada and I hate I bought a giant bikini collection but bikini season is only 1 month here... therefore, bikinis suck!

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ok, searching for the perfect hairy dude in a bikini in snow picture as a humorous reply, means I now have a browser history no one can ever see ….. and I didnt find one that was funny

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago
[-] zewm@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I didn’t buy it. It was gifted to me. I didn’t know anything about EV. After having used it now for 8 years, I know I never want another EV ever again.

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Oh wow I see... I feel sorry for you getting a free car you could have just sold if it didn't fit the bill for you

[-] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Condos generally won’t let you have chargers. HOA hate everyone.

Not everyone can afford the boomer American dream of detached housing.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You can only try. My ex’s HOA did bring chargers up for a vote, but tabled it when they realized how limited the electrical service for common areas was

While I don’t know whether it would have passed, it’s a step

[-] Jhex@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

then why buy an electric car when OP knew full well charging was going to be troublesome?

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is a big argument against EV mandates that several U.S. states have proposed. Where the fuck do people in apartments and condos charge?

The excuses by EV supporters don't cut it either.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Part of the infrastructure funding for EVs was targeted to help landlords and HOAs. Plus my state had landlord incentives similar to those for purchasers. Yes we know those need a kickstart

The other thing is the timing. None of those mandates were immediate. Most of them were ten years or more, only affecting new cars. So we have a full decade to get chargers in more places and at least another decade where most cars were still ICE: we can do it

[-] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

So we have a full decade to get chargers

The logical answer here is to make the EV mandate tied to actual infrastructure build-out milestones then. Build the infrastructure then mandate EVs, rather than mandating EVs and hoping that infrastructure gets built out quickly enough.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Trick question: You need both.

It’s not realistic to build the infrastructure first, then transition: no one could afford that. It would be a huge waste and a boondoggle.

However I do think it was well planned: even the Chinese government would be surprised at our planning….. if we had actually followed through.

In addition to the decades long transition, there was

  • subsidies for car manufacturers to retool and retrain
  • incentives for EV buyers
  • incentives for home charger installers, from consumer to landlord to business
  • infrastructure money to start building out trip chargers along interstates

So yes, the infrastructure would have grown with the market, more smoothly than the market alone could have. Yes American companies would have solid business advantages in new technologies. Yes, American car companies would still be relevant at that point

[-] melfie@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Nice, first I’ve heard of Slate. Privacy-focused EV and looks like they offer customizable trucks and SUVs.

Edit:

Looking at it further, it appears it’s a pick-up truck with an optional SUV conversion kit. I like the tinkerer aspect of it, but the “SUV” would have 2 doors instead of 4, which is certainly not ideal. It’s already a pain in the ass to strap a child into a car seat with 4 doors. I’d also be curious about the passenger safety of those riding in the back seat with regard to how securely the rear roof and frame are attached. I also wonder how this vehicle will get around the U.S. law coming into effect in 2027 where vehicles must have a kill switch. Overall, it seems like a $20k truck would be compelling, but the SUV concept needs more work.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

seems like a $20k truck would be compelling

they won't be $20K, or even $25K.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Meanwhile my kids are at college. I’ll take that two door suv because most of the year it’ll be just me. Actually I’m hoping the seats are easily removable so most of the year i can leave them out and just have a wide open cargo/dog/camping area

Speculation but ….. some of the pictures are a bit awkward looking, leading me to speculate there is no real frame on the back, just the structure from the pickup cab. Maybe that “roll bar” is sufficient for back seat passengers too

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
609 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

85782 readers
3402 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS