299
submitted 6 days ago by mudkip@lemdro.id to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 1 points 2 days ago

the nature of protest is to be uncomfortable

It sure doesn't make Sam Altman uncomfortable. It just sends the message that open source contributors are at our service and they better behave exactly the way we want or they get the paddle. We will continue not helping them, but we will also actively attack them if they displease us.

Surely that will not encourage grey beards to finally retire in peace, and discourage new maintainers from stepping up.

If things were acceptably moving at a “snail’s pace” before AI, what has changed?

As i said, what has changed is that AI can now find security issues and all major projects are hit by a flurry of legitimate security flaws. These affect all deployed instances of rsync, so basically most of the world's tech infrastructure. Leaving those gaping holes open is much more detrimental to the common good than fixing them. And that goes even if the fixes are not perfect and break marginal existing use cases.

you are pro AI. On the FuckAI board. Is this like a masochist thing? Like, what are you doing here?

I'm here cause i don't mind being disagreed with, in fact i need to be disagreed with if i don't want to fall into a fact-starved self-selected cognitive bubble. I'm also active on LinkedIn punching libertarian hustlers in the dick when they need it. You gotta make sure some asshole you disagree with isn't accidentally making a great point you have failed to identify.

I'm not against AI but i'm also not "pro AI", any more than i am pro mouse or pro keyboard. But i am definitely against bullying our few remaining open source contributors.

[-] petrol_sniff_king 1 points 2 days ago

It sure doesn't make Sam Altman uncomfortable.

Well, this one's about Andrew Tridgell, so that would make sense.

These affect all deployed instances of rsync, so basically most of the world's tech infrastructure.

Do you... not even realize that you are demanding work from him? The thing you are accusing me of doing.

If you need these security fixes so badly, shouldn't you be paying him? Or making your own contributions? The merge request form is right there, man, why are you just sitting here on your self-entitled ass.

Surely that will not encourage grey beards to finally retire in peace,

Yeah, if he wants to. I'm not saying this to be spiteful, like "yeah! he should step down!" I mean, genuinely, it sounds like he wants to go sailing, he should do that. That sounds fun.

You have a whole John Galt attitude about this retiring thing, it's weird.

I'm not against AI but i'm also not "pro AI",

You are. You are doing that thing that centrists do where they're "not against gay people" but they do mind when "people get uppity with the cops" which means you are pro AI. White people pretending that reconstruction in the US wasn't their problem—the list goes on and on.

I don't know why you're insisting on this anyway; you've already said you like AI.

[-] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago

I don’t know why you’re insisting on this anyway

my guess would be low executive function and a smidge of autism

[-] petrol_sniff_king 1 points 1 day ago

C'mon, you don't have to be mean to yourself.

this post was submitted on 31 May 2026
299 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

7256 readers
1100 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS