782
Atmosphere (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago

They messed with the aspect ratio too didn't they? Shots are framed wrong now

[-] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Old stuff made for TV is often in 4:3, the modern stuff is in 16:9 or even wider like for cinema. Sometimes older stuff was filmed in something closer to 16:9 and was cropped to 4:3, you can just crop it differently for a remaster without losing anything. You can see that in the picture, there's a lot more space to the right of the characters, which unfortunately places them closer to the center instead of the side of the screen.

[-] Hoimo@ani.social 1 points 41 minutes ago

I really don't get the recropping/uncropping to get 4:3 into a 16:9 aspect ratio. There's a release of Seinfeld where they just chopped the top and bottom off the frame, which very often crops people's foreheads out of frame and in some instances crops entire jokes out. Like, someone will react to something on a table, but the table is just out of frame for the entire scene.

If the director is very smart, it is possible to film for both, but in most cases it's just not worth it. Aspect ratio is an artistic choice. You wouldn't chop the sides off a painting to make it fit your wall.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

I remember watching an early episode of Angel that clearly had been un-cropped, because you can very clearly see a camera man filming an action scene from a different angle.

[-] albbi@piefed.ca 37 points 1 day ago

Yeah, cropping was a pretty big issue too.

[-] RickyRigatoni@piefed.zip 22 points 1 day ago

Mel Brookes probably loved seeing this.

[-] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 20 points 1 day ago

Exactly. A lot of times there is footage to pull out that got cropped out of the original broadcast, BUT the original shot was made with the crop in mind and there was a decision made about how to crop that particular scene. Just tossing in the full frame without any thought about the result can really change the feel of a scene.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Our 21:9 cinema (or whatever the 1:xyz is) and 16:9 home ratio is the equivalent to the old school 16:9 cinema and 4:3 old ratio.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Good analogy, but it is not nearly as close. Movie aspect ratios are actually variable. Most movies today switch several times over the course of the movies depending on what the director wants to convey. The problem is that they can easily do that on theaters, where the screens seamlessly accommodate the different aspect ratios almost imperceptibly for the audience, but to great emotional impact. However, the same is not true for home TVs, it is a little less flexible and far more noticeable.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago

Yeah but most formats come very close around 21:9 where the bars are less distracting than on a 16:9 monitor

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
782 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

7758 readers
1041 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS