249
This is already pretty real
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
249 points (100.0% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
9348 readers
332 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/TenForward@lemmy.world - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/Memes@lemmy.world - General memes
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
My prejudice will last if only by principle. I may not be the majority, but my god. If I know I can read something written out of passion by someone made of flesh and blood, I’m not going to waste my time reading something generated by something that’s never experience the sun on their skin. That’s the difference. I’m not prejudiced against people. I’m prejudiced against virtual skin walkers.
Prejudices do tend to persist and that is your business, I am human and I am as invested in a human future as you are, my point only is that if you can not tell from the work itself that it is machine written then you are not discarding it on the grounds of literary appreciation which is the only way writing should be judged. Plus AI is a human construct and trained upon and represents a condensation of human efforts. In that sense AI output might be viewed as just another human expression.
writing doesn't necessarily need to be judged in "literary appreciation".
Though it does fit as the most general case currently.