29

Disappointed to be wrong, but intrigued about further developments coming from these findings

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago

I'm not entirely convinced it was a con job, I think there was lack of academic rigor and the researchers that published were deeply overworked and underprepared. Publish or perish leads to mistakes on this scale or worse being published and accepted as fact dozens of times over on a daily basis.

[-] Deadend@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

There was a race to publish by different people involved. That’s why I mean self-con. They were in such a rush to be THE GUY.

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

science

3 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS