793

Regretful cities aren't sure how to cancel their surveillance contracts, so they are literally covering their cameras.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why aren't they just... Removing them?

Oh. Its probably because removing them is unnecessarily complicated so they need the company to come do it for them.

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

You don't have to worry about a complicated removal if you have an angle grinder.

[-] lando55@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 months ago

You'd be surprised how few worries I have when I'm brandishing an angle grinder

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

on a totally unrelated topic, but harbor freight is a great place to get affordable tools.

[-] glitch1985@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

And if you time your visit right, free bucket!

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Bucket is always free if you got your grinder with you.

[-] orenj@leminal.space 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I was thinking hacksaw but I like where your mind is at.

[-] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

If you had read the article you'd know that the cities aren't sure if they can remove them under the terms of their contracts with flock. So they're covering them while working that out.

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

I'm pretty sure one city did remove them and then Flock just came and put new ones up which is what lead to the trash bags.

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 3 points 2 months ago
[-] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Why read all article when some article good enough?

What am I? Some kind of readist? A phisosopher?

[-] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago

READING FOR NERDS

[-] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

I in fact did not read the article.

[-] sobchak@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

I've heard the excuse that they're private property so they can't. They're not hard to remove though. They're usually just attached to poles with pipe clamps.

[-] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I'm not so sure about that because even if they are privately owned, that doesn't mean they have the inherent right to be mounted on a city pole. The property isnt harmed by removing them from the pole and storing them in a deep underground bunker infested with Hanta Virus rats, black widows, and alligators.

[-] Pulsar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

If I remember correctly the agreement is some kind of lease, so the city/county doesn't really own them after they are installed.

this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
793 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

86901 readers
3010 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS