468
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

So, living objects can regulate the amount of carbon-14 specifically, not just carbon in general? And then, knowing the ratio of carbon-14 in a living creature, we know how much time passed by? Or is it that it breaks into nitrogen that reduces the overall amount of carbon, and this is what we detect?

Because otherwise it shouldn't matter whether they died and carbon-14 broke down for a thousand years or carbon-14 broke down for a thousand years and then the recent creature consumed it. The ratio of carbon isotopes must be the same, as carbon-14 would decay anyway.

Here I assume that whatever happens with carbon-14 in fossils also happens with any carbon-14 around us. It's not that it breaks down in fossils specifically, but not in everything else. So the order shouldn't matter, unless the ratio is different in a living organism. As a matter of assumption, that is.

[-] Thalfon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 hours ago

So, from what I understand, living things maintain (or at least prior to the industrial revolution did maintain) a predictable ratio of C-14 to C-12. I'm not super familiar with the mechanics of this, I imagine it's a case of the amount of C-14 lost matching the rate it was replaced via respiration.

Once the organism dies, it stops controlling that ratio and we can measure the decay using a sample of the material.

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I see! If so, that makes sense, but the mechanics of C14 accumulation would be curious to see.

[-] maxwellfire@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I don't think it's that the plants are controlling the ratio. I think it's that more C14 is being made all the time. And it only gets mixed into plants when they are living. Specifically it looks like C14 based CO2 is made in the atmosphere and then consumed by plants.

this post was submitted on 27 May 2026
468 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

20304 readers
1997 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS