386
submitted 17 hours ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The American worker is on a productivity tear and it may have more to do with a surge in working from home than the effects of AI, according to a Stanford economist.

For the past five years, the output for non-farm businesses has increased by a sizable 2% per year, The Economist reported citing statistics from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. This is a marked increase from the 1% productivity growth per year that defined most of the 2010s, and a trend that has taken even Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell by surprise.

Yet, while the hype around AI over the past several years makes it a logical candidate for the main driver behind the productivity boom, Nicholas Bloom, a Stanford economics professor who is known for explaining the Great Resignation of the early 2020s, says it’s more likely work-from-home policies since the pandemic are fueling the trend.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 108 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Imagine:

  • matching employees to jobs they are good at and enjoy, even if not physically nearby (a lot of good people have to take care of family, or have support networks they can’t/shouldn’t leave)
  • having a minimum of 30 more minutes a day back because you don’t have to commute
  • having a private quiet office to work in. Virtually no offices have private offices anymore.
  • having all your accessibility requirements met by default
  • being able to have healthier and cheaper lunches because you’ve got your full kitchen

There are things I miss about the office for sure, but I like remote work a lot.

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 75 points 16 hours ago

But think about it from the business's perspective!

  • lower rent

  • lower utilities

  • distributed IT

  • all employee work online/archivable by default

  • happier/healthier employees

  • access to global talent pool

  • easier to replace employees with LLMs!

The rabid return to office push is what really convinced me that most businesses are not in the hands of people who are trying to Do their business the best. At minimum it's extrovert CEOs, and feckless middle managers that didn't want to adapt

[-] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 26 points 15 hours ago

Their investors also have lots of money stuck in commercial real estate. And everyone knows golden egg geese are only good to bail out failed investments.

[-] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

The lower rent point is one of the problems. Many of these businesses own the real estate or lease for many years at a time. If the space is 70% unused, that increases costs and looks bad.

[-] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

Turning out the lights would help, but how does an unused building increase costs? There is for sure minimum cost to maintain the building for sake or later use, but unless they’re giving remote employees stipends for home office space, it should still cost less than back to work.

The big problem is still managers that want to feel important or intimidate underlings, and the same managers who have no clue how to measure productivity. Code line commit counts being a prime example.

[-] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 7 points 15 hours ago

But how will your owners exercise arbitrary control and surveillance of you? I'm sorry but you just can't be productive like thay

[-] scytale@piefed.zip 3 points 14 hours ago

The wost part is they already have control and surveillance with all the endpoint management software installed on company devices.

[-] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 2 points 13 hours ago

That's not as satisfying as in personand you know it

this post was submitted on 17 May 2026
386 points (100.0% liked)

News

37661 readers
1558 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS