187
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
187 points (100.0% liked)
politics
29802 readers
2042 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Nah, we're totally just disagreeing with your fringe views. You're screaming at people that they want to show porn to kids. We're just saying it's up to the parents to decide what's porn and what's not. No one is saying that kids have to or even should read those books. We just say parents should be able to decide, not you.
so, you haven't read anything I've said. Just say that, man.
I literally have said that parent should decide. Almost everytime. Parents should decide, kids shoudn't be able to just freely obtain those books. Those books don't belong in a school library for kids. They can be in the regular library where parents can decide and allow what is apporpriate for their kid. I have never said "I decide what kids read", I said "the public decides what kids can read in school, and parents decide what kids can read at home"
I don't know how many more times you need to read this until you understand. Like I said, I think you are just being willfully obtuse because you saw the arrow, turned off your brain and decided to be contrarian.
Except that's not what you said. You accused people of wanting to show porn to kids and said that those books should be banned from school libraries. Not that they should be accessible only with parental permission. That's two different things. If you would say "I think it's fine for those books to be in the library but there should be a special section for books that require permission from parents" most people would agree with you.
Yeah, the public doesn't decide what kids can read in school. The public decides what is mandatory reading in school, parents decide what their kids can read in their spare time or in the library. If I give my kid a book to read in the bus or during lunch time you can't say he can't read it just because you don't like it. You keep proposing censorship but somehow are unable to recognize this.
I swear you're just being willfully pedantic.....
Obviously I mean the public decides what books the school has for kids to read... not that you can't give your kid a book and then they read it at school. Because that's you, as a parent, making a decision about what your kid can read, which is what I've been saying. You just wanted to twist it like you're doing now, for whatever reason. I don't know, maybe you lack excitement in your life.
Oh, so the books are fine and it's everyone who opposes the ban doesn't want to give porn to kids? Great, we finally agreed.