699
Coco Chanel
(quokk.au)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
699 points (100.0% liked)
Comics
1518 readers
599 users here now
Post your comics here. Single or multi boxed comics.
Please mark nsfw when appropriate.
Same rules as primary server, no hate.
Please warn others if there may be triggers.
Please mark if the comic is yours either in the title or description
obvious ai images will be removed, please include a source to prevent this
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's not. If I was a Nazi, I could post this comic with glee.
Yes it is. Because nazis have very little reading comprehension.
If you think that anyone who is "more" than just a conservative is stupid or at the very least badly read, then boy do I have news for you. You are underestimating how many ultra strategical 4-D chess players exist within the reactionary political scene. You are one Matrix room away from meeting them. I know this because I've made such acquaintances (unfortunately). You are underestimating the mental calculus needed for re-implementing systems of forced labour and expansionist militarism. I personally doubt that 99.5% percent of people could take on someone like Stephen Miller on the level of rhetoric and planning.
Sure bud.
What exactly is your point, here? Are you suggesting a comic about gay women and jewelry is by a Nazi? What are you getting at?
And btw, 'collaborator' in this context is usually a negative connotation unless she's talking about a Nazi fashion project.
None, You suggest I ought to positively have one, but I can just say whatever I want. I never said that it was by a Nazi, I was if anything hinting at its ambiguity.
That woman wasn't just a collaborator. She was deep in the shit. Also what do you mean by negative, the comic is just stating a plain fact. You make it negative, a Nazi would make it positive.
Someone ”being a collaborator" is a negative phrase, just like being Infamous is being famous for bad things. No one calls someone a collaborator positively. "In collaboration," or "we collaborated" are innocent. "A collaborator," usually an accusation of being complicit in a crime.
This is the first definition. It's used positively, neutrally, negatively, etc. "A person who works with others towards a common goal."
The second definition fits yours, but it's the second definition.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/collaborator
True. That dude probably just loved team science projects with the Nazis, like Fun With Brownian Physics.
Collaboration makes the world go round. 👨❤️💋👨
"You can tell how smart someone is by how they play this board game"
Of course you think that, you're twelve