78
submitted 1 month ago by Zapados@sh.itjust.works to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Ah did they not do it in the end, I knew they were trying to but never heard any more about it so didn't know if it went through.

We will see, as you say the problem is tobacco companies have a lot of money, I just don't wish to see prohibition under the guise of public health, prohibition is always a tool of oppression and not in peoples interest. I'd rather see an outright ban in public places to actually benefit public health :)

[-] inari@piefed.zip 2 points 1 month ago

I mean, is it? I'm happy to have stuff like asbestos prohibited. There's a bunch of harmful stuff that is banned all the time and it's a net positive in my opinion

[-] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

Yeh that is fair, I concede that saying "always" is not accurate.

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
78 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2174 readers
795 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS