1300
Mental breakdown for the win
(lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
1300 points (100.0% liked)
Late Stage Capitalism
3111 readers
263 users here now
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc. This includes instance shaming.
Introduction to Socialism (external links)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You'll regret that decision.
Oh and btw, you blame the "boomers" for lobbying congress for more favourable rental law. But did you know that corporations are the ones buying up all the property and inflating house prices?
You attributed that with such confidence to the boomers. But it's patently false by every measure. "Boomers" have no lobbying as a collective group in congress.
If you're so confident on something so patently absurd, how much else have you gotten wrong in your analysis?
Btw corporate America owns your democracy. They are (apart from Israel) basically the only lobbying group.
^ that's how blind your anger has made you. Congrats.
Yes, uh, I agree with you, corporations, which are owned by boomers . . .
It's called the AARP . . . This is what i mean you really think everybody out there is a sweet grandparent that works an honest living and never committed any crimes and never cheated on their spouse and never lied in a civil trial for money. Our country is fucked up, be careful out there.
No. They're owned by generational wealth of varying ages. Some of which goes back 100's of years. Boomers are an entire generation that span, working, middle and wealth classes. It's a useless means of division.
Might want to have some humility when you're proven wrong. When you can admit you're wrong, that's when you learn something new, and grow as a human being. It's very anticapitalist to be wrong and show vulnerability btw.
Exaggerating my position to make your point is a logical fallacy. Nice.
The AARP at the most wields around 10% of the entire lobbying ability of all lobbyists in congress.
Comparitively, direct corporate lobbyists wield ~85%.
I accept they exist, but they're small potatoes in the grand scheme of lobbying.
The AARP is also a weird group to mention as its isnt what it seems.
In some aspects they protect working class interests by advocating capping Medicare drug costs and fighting age discrimination. Also at least a third of their membership are older people who rent their homes and are cost burdened by that rent.
But then on the flipside, they mostly seem to act as a corporation themselves, by utilising their name recognition to partner with corporations to sell products and scam OAPs out of their capital.
What I'm trying to get you to see is that if you scratch beneath the surface enough and you always have more centralised corporate profit and greed. This time targeting vulnerable old people.
The ultra wealthy people and corporations, regardless of age or affiliation, are the ones that need to go.
To clarify: Gertrude 72, rents her home, and is a member of the AARP. She is a boomer. She has spent much of her modest pension on financial and health products targeted at her by companies using the AARP brand. She lives a very simple life with few luxuries. Would you put Gertrude in prison or shoot her bluecluestoothpaste?
What im trying to get through to you is that corporations are made up of real human beings, they're not alien invisible beings that can exculpate humanity, they're created and organized by humans for humans. Every sin that a corporation is guilty of, there are many humans equally guilty, the corporate charter is just a piece of paper humans created to organize for profit.
The fuck are you talking who said anything about violence???
Ah so finally you've climbed down and we agree. You've just literally argued against your first point there. Not just boomers, lots of different kinds of humans. Good. Exactly. We agree.
Most don't have any say in how that corporate greed occurs btw. That's down to c-suite and shareholders. Most employed or involved with those corporations are being used and abused by one degree or another.
A small number are middle men who implement awful things on behalf of shareholders, on a smallish scale. They implement the shit sliding downhill from senior management and shareholders. How culpable are these guys? Do they deserve prison? Or to be executed?
There's a tiny section of the population that has any power to do meaningful change, and they're the owners of said corporations and the political elites. They are the only ones actively abusing their power on a large scale for their immediate and long-term benefit. They are the ones that apply the pressure downwards, they're the ones making most people's lives miserable.
Again not boomers. Just people, and most of the blame is on rich and wealthy people at that.
Or prison? You missed that part of my comment. I gave you options to choose from.
But I also gave you the option of violence because that's where the hate you express leads us. To violent revolution, widespread death, and executions of anyone deemed to have in any way benefitted from the previous regime, even slightly. If you can't display compassion and allow your anger to blind you to nuanced thinking where people can be both victims and complicit, where division along most lines are useless, we are doomed to repeat history's most awful sagas.
History shows us this in great detail. Using the measures you have mentioned, Trump, Brexit, etc over half the population of western countries like the USA or the UK would be up for retribution. That invariably leads to violence if you can't see the nuance or show where the buck stops. If you instead divide people by meaningless categories and throw your anger at people undeserving, when the time for change comes, when does the pain stop?
Would you put those who voted for Brexit or Trump or who are just middle class, in prison? Please answer the question.
Would you put Gertrude in prison for virtue of being a boomer? Please answer the question.
Dividing us by age category is a pointless endeavour. It's based on generational jealousy and an assumption that ignorant boomers know what they're doing - most really don't. They're stupid as fuck.
Boomers were born in a time before the wealth class had gamed the system to their benefit, before they had rigged it to squeeze every last penny out of the rest of us. They're also largely brain damaged by lead poisoning and age related cognitive decline.
How many more times do I need to argue you into a logical corner before you admit division based on age is relatively useless?
But mostly boomers, sure some older millenials in the mix too.
And then the very next sentence you ask me to admit division based on age is useless . . .