496
submitted 6 days ago by theacharnian@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 48 points 6 days ago

"Source I've never seen claims someone on Twitter heard something outrageous from an anonymous source"

Did this happen? Maybe. Is this upvoted solely because of people's pre-existing biases? Yup.

[-] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

One source appears to be the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights. It says in the article.

[-] bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Where did they get the information from?

Obscure self styled human rights organizations are often used to launder information and give it more credibility. This isn’t HRW, Amnesty, or B’Tselem. They aren’t perfect either, but more credible.

[-] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 6 points 5 days ago

They got the information from someone who was raped by a dog. It says in the article.

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 2 points 5 days ago

The analyst in "says analyst" was a guy on Twitter.

It is mentioned that PCHR recorded similar testimony from a Palestinian source later on.

Again, maybe, maybe not.

[-] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 7 points 5 days ago

"geopolitical expert" it says. Here's his Google scholar page. Seems legit. I mean I guess he is still "a guy on twitter", in that he has a Twitter account

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Novara Media is a socialist news organization, so they definitely have a bias, but their informational reporting is no less credible than the BBC or Guardian. They have a decently large presence in the UK.

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 5 days ago
[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago

Why would their factual reporting not be reliable? Their core audience is extremely well educated who would not tolerate blatant falsehoods like right-wing tabloid audiences do.

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 5 days ago

And yet, everybody smashed upvote on this rage bait without reading it. Education and wealth only gets you so far.

TBF they didn't really make direct factual claims here, they just quoted the sources, so even if it's not true it's not a lie. I'm not sure how often Fox News just straight up lies either.

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Fox News lies often. And the BBC does this kind of thing all the time.

[-] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

You're wrong. I've been reading/listening to Novara every day for over five years. They are left wing in opinion, and 100% factual in their reporting. They are more responsible about correcting errors than the BBC or the Guardian. As the other response, I would have ditched them at any point if I found them to be dishonest.

Honestly, I hope this one is fake. It's fucked up if real.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 11 points 6 days ago

Ragebait works on everyone. You just need to know what buttons to push.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago

I can offer up a story on it from a British Business magazine, if the Novara source seems biased or uncredible.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/un-report-systematic-sexual-violence-israeli-detention-1792474

[-] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 1 points 4 days ago
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
496 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55730 readers
1141 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS