46
submitted 6 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/europe@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago
[-] Pirtatogna@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Trains are awesome but they are severely lacking in their ability to cross large bodies of water.

[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 days ago

Elon in shambles

[-] Pirtatogna@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Nonexistent where I live. One between Helsinki and Tallin would be cool, though.

[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago
[-] Zron@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Inconceivably, those also use fossil fuels.

[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago
[-] Zron@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Battery low energy density. Need big battery. Big battery very heavy. Very heavy make boat no float and need more power to move. More power to move mean need bigger battery. Big battery very heavy…

[-] Pirtatogna@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Works with gasoline/diesel/whatnot which we're running out of too.

[-] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago
[-] Pirtatogna@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I don't think there are regular sailboat connections either :(

[-] racoon@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

You can’t train for lack of fossil fuels. You just suck it up and accept the GDP loss

[-] DecentM 8 points 5 days ago

Think op meant "use trains" not to train for this situation

He absolutely did, but that guys reply is gold if you assume he also means a choo choo train.

this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
46 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

6541 readers
135 users here now

Europe

Rules:

  1. All sources allowed. Voting decides what is reliable unless
  2. Articles which have been proven false beyond any doubt may be removed
  3. No personal attacks
  4. Posts in English, translations allowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS