108
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
108 points (100.0% liked)
News
37166 readers
2107 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Normally, I'd actually side against NJ on this one. World Cup host cities generally provide public transit for free during matches. It's expected and helps normal people who spent a lot of money on travel and hotel and food and tickets to get to the match. Also, public transportation to the Meadowlands was poorly designed from the get go, and NJ should be punished for allowing it to be as bad as it is with car parking being the primary means of getting to the stadium.
But FIFA is not allowing NJ to use the parking lots at or near the stadium as actual parking lots. And most fans going to these matches are not living in or will not be getting hotels in NJ. NJ will bear all the cost burden but with none of the tourist income. I also wonder how much NJ was included in the NYC bid to host. Maybe a lot but from a different governor, I don't know.
Big sporting event as line the Olympics and the World Cup are advertised as a boon to the hosts, for economic benefits through increased tourism. But most host cities realize that's a lie, that they lose money in the end.
That's the point, right? Businesses wanna make money by taking it from others. Obviously. Don't let yourself get played.
Trust me, I understand that just as well as you do. I've been following Olympics hosting scandals since the 1990s and WC hosting issues since 2006. Like I said, I am siding with NJ on this one. If the stadium were in NYC where people could take the subways, I wouldn't. NYC is getting all the tourist revenue while NJ is getting all the transport and security burden. NYC is charging $90/night in taxes on just hotels. All the food and alcohol being purchased will also add to the money that city makes. They could subsidize some subway tickets. But in this case, you can't take a subway to Met Life... you can't even take a direct train to Met Life. You also can't drive to it during the WC.
Other host cities, probably not getting any benefit. LA might do OK, since we aren't doing jack shit extra for the WC except hosting watch parties that are not free.
I'm not getting played. I don't support FIFA and am boycotting this WC. I also boycotted Russia and Qatar. I could have afforded to go to either of those games but chose to not even watch them. I was crazy excited for this WC, but now I'm not even going to watch them on TV. Fuck this whole thing and fuck FIFA. But I will always support a city providing public transport to people spending thousands in just taxes to visit.
Why would host cities be expected to give a freebie to fans for a for profit event? Do they do it for Taylor Swift concerts? For Superbowl attendees? If tourists or the event organizers aren't paying for their rides, the residents are. Cities should stop doing what's expected by for-profit companies and start doing what's good for their people.
Maybe because the host cities are using tourist dollars to provide tourist services for tourists doing tourist things. It's a $4/match benefit in exchange for taxes from a $200/night hotel (in a non-US country), 10% from whatever their food and alcohol bill is for the week, taxes from flights into/out of the city, taxes on the match tickets, etc.
Taxes on a hotel stay in the US are like $15/night in a cheap city. NYC hotels are $30/night for state tax plus $20/night for city tax on a normal day, not during WC matches. And you are upset that some cities use that to cover $4? With hotels jacking up prices for the weeks of WC matches, and tickets costing $500 (which have sales tax as a percentage), the state is getting a ton of revenue. The Hilton in Times Square for 2 nights during the Ecuador Germany game is $541/night BEFORE an additional $90/night in taxes. $90/night in taxes and you are upset about giving a person a free subway ride to a game? I get that the matches in NJ aren't just a subway ride away, which is why I'm siding with NJ on this case; but in most host cities in previous WCs, the matches are at stadiums with easy subway access.
Your argument would have merit if these were simply amenities provided to all tourists, because they all pay the same fees. They don't give Swifties free transportation. Or a real "regular guy" traveling to the city to actually visit the city. If FIFA wants a special perk for their attendees they should use some of their profits to purchase it.
Do you New York City is in New Jersey? Those expensive hotel night taxes are going to a different state.
Maybe if you had read my original post to understand the context of this post you would have seen where I wrote, "And most fans going to these matches are not living in or will not be getting hotels in NJ. NJ will bear all the cost burden but with none of the tourist income. I also wonder how much NJ was included in the NYC bid to host." I wasn't making a point about NYC specifically in this second post. I was talking about host cities in general. NYC is ALSO not providing free subway rides for match goers, even though they are reaping most of the benefits.
But go ahead and like you are smarter than everyone else.
Free for the fans is fine and encouragable. Free for FIFA fuck no