1185
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I have mixed feelings on this. If the entire world had access to free healthcare, chances are research and development would grind to a halt unless they also funded research and development. Taxpayers would need to be willing to pay a company hundreds of millions of dollars if they discovered a useful product.

...it can work in theory, but I'm not sure if it would work in a democracy. The average voter would demand that money be spent on more immediately useful services. If it did work, however, we would save the billions of dollars pharmaceutical companies spend on lawyers and marketing.

I also believe in free education, which includes research facilities.

[-] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

You could fund the facilities, but how many people would be willing to get a doctorate in biological chemistry if the only available jobs were relatively low paying civil servants?

Most of the researchers in the pharmaceutical industry were employed as minimum wage workers during their six years in college. We would have to completely overhaul the incentive structure if we expected colleges to replace the for profit industry.

[-] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 46 minutes ago

biological chemistry

fun fact: I have had a years-long interest into biochemistry since i was 12, and i want to study biology because of it, but i can't; because i don't have the time/money, because i need to get a job now to earn money, instead of spending another 6 years in school.

[-] T156@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

If the entire world had access to free healthcare, chances are research and development would grind to a halt unless they also funded research and development. Taxpayers would need to be willing to pay a company hundreds of millions of dollars if they discovered a useful product.

I don't see why it would. A company would still invest in research if they thought they had a chance to sell it to the healthcare system, for example. It wouldn't be the first nor last time something like that happened, and the latter case isn't too different from how it works already.

Consider insulin, for example. Research into it and drugs for treatment of diabetes doesn't happen exclusively in the US.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
1185 points (100.0% liked)

World News

55432 readers
3061 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS